Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of The Apprentice (U.S.) candidates/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:25, 9 January 2010.

List of The Apprentice (U.S.) candidates

 * Nominator(s): Another Believer  ( Talk ) 01:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets criteria. I made similar lists for Big Brother, Project Runway and Dancing with the Stars, so I feel I know most of the issues that need to be addressed. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Support.—NMajdan &bull;talk 14:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quick comment – Should Spring in "Spring 2010" be de-capitalized?  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 22:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * According to MOS, season are lowercase "in almost all instances". Furthermore, "When personified, season names may function as proper nouns, and they should then be capitalized: I think Spring is showing her colors; Old Man Winter." I will go ahead and lowercased Spring, and keep in mind the new season will start soon so "spring" will be removed regardless. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 08:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments Support
 * Donald Trump's "apprentice" → Donald Trump's apprentice
 * Done. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * winner donating their → winners donating their or winner donating his or her
 * Done. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the highlighting of the winners is unnecessary because their Finish is always 1st.
 * Done. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * With only one person appearing twice, I don't think highlighting of her name is necessary.
 * Just thought I would point out that it was preferred over at List of Project Runway contestants. If you would still like the coloring removed, I'd be happy to. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's necessary for that list either; it's also redundant because it's listed in the lead. The previous point about winners and runners up also applies to that list.
 * Done. Removed coloring for Omarosa. I will not worry about the Project Runway list since that went through its own FL nomination process. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Notes III and IV should be combined because they say the same thing.
 * Not sure how to combine these. I tried, but was unable to. Also, I didn't know if (given the different sorting features) users might find it confusing which candidates were fired at the same time. Note III and Note IV both tell you specifically which candidates were fired at the same time. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean. Perhaps you could add something else to the notes so they aren't identical. Reywas92 Talk 01:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. If you prefer different wording, just let me know! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Good job overall! Reywas92 Talk 02:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Support Although I would definitely say the winners should be marked by a color of some kind. I realize the column says they are the winner, but that deserves an additional identifier. Staxringold talkcontribs 01:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.