Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Tokyo Mew Mew chapters


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 01:46, 6 December 2008.

List of Tokyo Mew Mew chapters
I am nominating this list for featured list status as I believe it meets all of the current FLC criteria. The entire article is well sourced using reliable references. The lead is comprehensive and provides the relevant details normally found in a chapter list, with the appropriate opening sentence and an appropriate image in the upper right corner. The list itself is well-formatted, comprehensive, and complete. The individual volume summaries are of a reasonable length for 200 page volumes, with all summaries around 300 words each. It has been extensively peer reviewed, both through its own talk page and in the formal PR process, and all issues brought up have been addressed. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Support, Read the summaries and they were easy to understand. Sources are okay.Tintor2 (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Comment Is "afterward" the word they use, or should it be "afterword"? The latter is more typical for an essay-like piece of writing by the author. But maybe afterward is being used instead of "epilogue"?Dillypickle (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmmm...I'll have to double check that volume this evening. Might be my own typo. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 16:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Checked and yes, they actually use "afterward" instead of "afterword." Its a page with comments from the author, which is normally called afterword in most other series, so its probably another typo from that volume (it had several). Should I mark it with [sic] or a footnote? -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 02:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.