Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of UEFA Cup Winners' Cup winners


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 15:55, 24 August 2008.

List of UEFA Cup Winners' Cup winners
I'm putting this list up for FLC as I believe that it meets the criteria necessary to become a featured list. The list has undergone a peer review where issues were ironed out. Thanks in advance for your comments. NapHit (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Now comments deal with, good work. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Support from Killervogel5  - Good work!

Comments
 * Why does it not have the results of replays?
 * The results of the replays are in the notes section NapHit (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Notes column is mostly refs.
 * The notes column are for both notes and refs NapHit (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't really need the sorting buttons.
 * They are notable enough to be in the table. Bucs (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, sort facilities should be included wherever possible, per FLC criterion 4. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  13:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Only when it's a list of numbers (I might be wrong there but I'm preetty sure). Bucs (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The sort function can be used for names, places and other stuff as well as numbers NapHit (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Since the "Most successful teams" section is so called does it really need to list every single team?
 * I don't really see a problem with this it's providing useful information and if I just included the winners, some of whom have been runners-up it would be wrong not to include every team that has not been runners-up.

Bucs (talk) 08:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, though... I think you should keep the information but not call it "most successful." Makes it seem like the list could be incomplete when in reality, it's not. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  17:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok I've changed it to "Winners by teams" hopefully that sorts the problem NapHit (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Might it be better as "Results by team," since there are some non-winners? KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  18:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Done NapHit (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * http://www.arsenal.com/article.asp?thisNav=News&article=472487 deadlinks
 * Per the MOS, link titles in the references shouldn't be in all capitals. (Current ref 27 MANCHESTER UNITED v. BARCELONA)
 * Otherwise sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments all issues have been taken care off NapHit (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.