Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of WCW World Television Champions/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 00:50, 12 December 2009.

List of WCW World Television Champions

 * Nominator(s): -- Will C  04:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because... I feel it meets the FL criteria. Remember me? Yeah, I'm back. Been a while since I nominated a list, but finally got another finished. As usual all comments will be fixed as soon as I become aware of them. I expanded this thing fully. From the old bad format to a newer cleaner better sourced look. Was pretty annoying considering the history of changes is unsure at times, but I believe I have gotten it to be correct.-- Will C  04:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Support.—NMajdan &bull;talk 01:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Support Mm40 (talk) 13:50, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The vacant rows don't sort correctly. They should show up at the top when the arrow is pointing down for names and days held.
 * Which column are you going by? Because I have them sorted by Vacant, to be like the rest.-- Will C  03:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you mean to be like the rest? Currently, if someone wanted to see who held the title for the most days with the table, the vacant rows come up first. Forget what I said about the names, I guess it's a matter of opinion. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean now. Not sure how to correct that. The days held column is done by the age in days template, combined with Template:nts ( | ). Vacant sections are done with the sort template, with a dash and sorted by double zz to appear last ( |— ). Not really sure how to fix the problem.-- Will C  22:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, no big issue. If someone wants to help fix it, the can go ahead. Mm40 (talk) 13:50, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the support.-- Will C  14:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.