Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Wisden Trophy records

List of Wisden Trophy records
Is a self-nomination. The list is cricket-related and I believe is well sourced. Think it meets FA criteria but am relatively new at this. Monsta666 22:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments - The lead is written a bit informally, and could do with a bit more referencing too. I'll try to reword a bit, but help me out :) Also, I see you've added a source (cricinfo) at the bottom of some of the tables - it would be better if you placed this inline (using cite.php) at the top of one of the columns. Otherwise it's good - fix up a few things, and I'll support. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 05:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Response - Put refs in lead (is that enough or are more needed?) and placed inline cites on tables Monsta666 10:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. Support. Good luck :) Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 03:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose
 * Severely abusive use of flags.
 * That can easily be removed - DIY, perhaps? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This can be removed but there should be a way of telling whether a is record held by the Englishman or West Indian. I felt the use of flags was the easiest way of doing this. Any ideas how I can do this without the use of flags? Added Later - Unnecessary flags have been removed but kept flags for players. Monsta666 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * How' but, y'know, just using the name of the "country"? I'm pretty most read can see that "England" and "West Indies" are different things. Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * In the players stats, flags should go for a "team" column. Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Poor formatting of tables making the sorting impossible (Main stats) or useless (records).
 * Erm, where is this sorting you speak of? None of the tables I see are sortable. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sort of my point, actually. There's no good reason they could not be made sortable (the only one is that their improper formatting prevents it.) Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what you are trying to get at. What does sortable tables mean? Monsta666 15:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * My bad, I sometimes forget not everyone is acquainted with that possibility. You'll want to look at Help:Sorting (though it's more technical than really needed for our purpose). A good way to make table more sortable is to use table captions instead of table-wide header cells at the top of tables. Circeus 05:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed some of it myself. Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Combination of various tables that shouldn't (every double from "List of captains" onward).
 * Are you proposing that these tables be removed? I feel the records section is relevant but that is just my opinion.Monsta666 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I say there should 2 table, not one. The combination into one is a nonsensical space-saving device that is entirely inappropriate. Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ the tables are now split. Monsta666 15:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Captains table should also be separated and sortable (although you could keep a simplified table to show only the series and captains). Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Despite what is said in the article, there is no "Notes" section.
 * Fixed. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed the table myself to avoid thetwo notes overtaken by the references. Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * See also not properly formatted.
 * ✅ Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Circeus 03:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)