Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Azerbaijan/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Azerbaijan

 * Nominator(s): Tone 07:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

With the Czech republic just being promoted, I am nominating the list of WHS in Azerbaijan. There are three sites and 10 tentative sites. The style follows the standard for these lists. Tone 07:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * - the rubric at the top of the page says "Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed". You literally only started one yesterday which has as yet had no comments at all...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Huh, I had in mind that it was ok to have two at the same time but forgot about the other part. Oops :) Ok, I'll freeze this one for the time being. --Tone 07:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, now the Armenia list has some decent support after the checking. I feel comfortable with returning this here now. --Tone 18:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Image review Pass

 * All of the images used in the article are uploaded by the user on Wikimedia commons under suitable licence. Also, I noticed that "Lok-Batan" Mud Cone does have an image (File:Mud vulcanoes azerbaijan gobustan.JPG). I'll suggest you to use it in the list. Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * According to the file name, that picture is from Gobustan, which is another location. I removed it from the Lok Batan article, which is in Absheron. --Tone 20:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * @ No real issues with the licencing, so Pass for image review.  Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Support Comments from TRM
That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "Following the breakup of Soviet Union" again, this isn't in the UNESCO source.
 * "2003 to 2009.[4] " and after 2009? Was it repaired?  Should be covered here.
 * "earthquake.[7][4]" ref order.
 * "Maiden tower"->"Maiden Tower"
 * "40.000 " 40,000
 * "Greater Caucasus Mountains" no need to capitalise mountains.
 * "(Fire - worshippers, temple - museum at Surakhany)" en-dashes, not hyphens.
 * "rich in fossils from" no need to link common English words.
 * Cells with no images, put in a centrally aligned en-dash or something to indicate that there's not one available, not that you just forgot.
 * "50 000 bones" 50,000
 * "at the altitude of" -> "at an elevation of"
 * "Mountains, at the altitude of 2,300 metres" similar to before, no need to capitalise mountain, and "at an elevation of"
 * "Khinalig - medieval" en-dash.
 * Use the reflist template.
 * Refs 11 and 19 need en-dash.
 * Fixed, thank you! --Tone 08:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * A courtesy ping, could you check if the changes are fine? --Tone 17:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Could you check this one, please ;) --Tone 09:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Support The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude

 * "The petroglyphs on rocky boulders at Gobustan document the human presence in the area spanning 40,000 years. There are over 6000 rock carvings" - any reason why one number is written with a comma and the other without?
 * Made it 6,000.
 * "There are three areas with petroglyphs within the buffer zone" - what's a "buffer zone"?
 * Removed, this is redundant anyway. Buffer zone is the area surrounding the main site where special protection is still in place.
 * "with the height of 70 metres" => "with a height of 70 metres"
 * That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thanks! --Tone 06:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

AryKun
Really nice work here, very little I could find wrong with this.
 * "first site inscribed to the list" → "first site added to the list" would be better
 * "Sheki" → "Shaki"? Not necessary, though.
 * mausoleum of Nakichevan → mausoleums of Nakhichevan?
 * Although not needed, a review at the FLC for List of birds of Nauru would be appreciated.
 * Thanks! I changed the first one, the second two are according to the source. These are sometimes using alternative spelling but I try to stick to that and link or mention the more standard naming later in the text. --Tone 08:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, will support then. AryKun (talk) 09:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N  19:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.