Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Bangladesh/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Bangladesh

 * Nominator(s): Tone 09:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Bangladesh has three sites on the list and a further five on the tentative list. The latter nominations are rather old, from the 1990s, so the descriptions are very brief (but still suffice). The list for Laos has just been promoted and the list for Sri Lanka is seeing some support, so I am adding a new nom. Tone 09:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * "The city represents some of most significant" => "The city represents some of the most significant"
 * "home to a large population of Bengal tigers (one pictured)" - it isn't (unless it's hiding under the water)
 * "The site comprises the remains about 50" => "The site comprises the remains of about 50"
 * That's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks. Not sure what was with the tiger, there definitely isn't tiger there :) Maybe I had another image in mind when working on the text. Tone 21:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by EN-Jungwon

 * Thanks for checking! I fixed the year listed column, great you spotted it. As for the tentative unesco reference number, these get sometimes updated when the nomination is improved, so I am leaving them out in the tentative lists as a rule. As for sorting, we are never using specific sorting templates, as sometimes The is a part of the name and sometimes just the article, so that would create possible confusion how to sort. Tone 13:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Support --  EN  - Jungwon  14:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments from HAL
That's all. ~ HAL  333  07:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * "was listed in 1997, and is a natural site" --> I don't think that comma is really needed — "is a natural site" isn't an independent clause.
 * I also fixed some of the sorting orders.


 * Thanks for checking! I removed the comma. As for the sorting, I usually don't do it (as mentioned above) but no issue here from my side. Tone 10:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Support ~ HAL  333  17:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

This hasn't been open as long as usual, but as a short list that's part of a series, I think it's fine to promote without waiting another few weeks. Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N  18:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.