Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Belarus/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Belarus

 * Nominator(s): Tone 18:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Belarus has four sites on the list and five tentative sites. The article follows the standard style for WHS. The sources for last site are messy, apparently the UNESCO site needs some cleaning, but it is possible to figure out what it is about. The lists for Sweden and the Netherlands are still running at the moment but they have decent support at this point so I am adding a new nom. Tone 18:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Support: Great work! Wright   Streetdeck  10:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * "This is also the only natural site in Belarus" => "This is the only natural site in Belarus"
 * " the Struve Geodetic Arc is also transnational site" => " the Struve Geodetic Arc is also a transnational site"
 * "were inviting artists, craftsmen, and architects" => "invited artists, craftsmen, and architects"
 * "These interactions helped transmitting" => "These interactions helped transmit"
 * The first sentence under the Augustow Canal is incredibly long and confusing - can you break it up?
 * "This nomination is considering" - this should really be "considers" rather than "in considering", but I actually think that "covers" would be a more appropriate verb
 * "In 17th and 18th centuries" => "In the 17th and 18th centuries"
 * Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thank you! --Tone 20:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass
Pass – reliability and formatting is good. Mostly reliant on UNESCO sources as is standard for UNESCO lists. Aza24 (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Support - this article is about to become an excellent example of how short articles can pass the FL criteria. The article is so well-made, interesting, and "comprehensiveness" and is overall just fantastic. Great work on improving it! Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment Avoid one-sentence paragraphs, as in the lead. Otherwise the list is ready for featured status. HĐ (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Tone 17:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Great work, HĐ (talk) 16:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.