Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Germany/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Germany

 * Nominator(s): Tone 12:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I got a suggestion to nominate Germany for a FLC in one of the previous nominations. I got it in shape faster than I thought, luckily the article was already quite extensive so I just had to fix the map and rewrite some descriptions which were copy-paste from the source earlier. Standard style. A long one this time, but luckily the tentative list is short. I suppose India is coming next, which is even longer, overall. The nomination for Latvia is seeing support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 12:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

GWL
Oh damn, this is a big one. I'll look into the main list later.  Gerald WL  05:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Long one indeed. I think I will wait until you are through the list and fix the issues in one sitting :) Tone 15:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Done! Feel free to look at 'em now :)  Gerald WL  03:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I am through. I think I solved all. Thank you, very good comments. Tone 10:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Re-checked the list and it looks all resolved now! Happy to support another part of this fascinating series.  Gerald WL  10:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

, all done- very nice work as usual! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 23:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * MyCatIsAChonk
 * - was four sites? Or should addition be plural?
 * Ha, this was outdated, fixed.
 * The use of "pictured" is inconsistent; IMO, it should be in every box to clarify what's being shown. If not that, then it must be added to places like Pilgrimage Church of Wies, which has no "pictured" in the desc despite being a photo of the structure itself
 * Well, I am using this wording if it is not obvious what is on the photo, like, if there are five buildings listed and I show one. If it is just one church, it is kind of redundant.
 * - this is an incomplete sentence; it's fine in a caption, but as far as I can tell all the other descs use full sentences
 * - from an architectural POV?
 * - some of which were renovated?
 * - this sentence contains way too many commas; I'd be much easier to read if you put it all together "The 1404 statue Roland is a statue of a knight representing knight of Charlemagne Roland, who symbolizes freedom."
 * - missing a conjunction after the comma
 * - typo in "consititute"; also, "together with related port infrastructure" is an odd addendum to the sentence since the first bit is about large warehouses- if you feel it's necessary to include, move it to the start of the sentence: Along with related port infrastructure, they constitute..."
 * - which hall? From what I see in the photo, only one hall is pictured
 * There are several halls, one of them is pictured. I think this is clear enough.
 * Thank you, I am through with checking. --Tone 05:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Support - btw, if you get any time, would appreciate any comments here; thanks! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 19:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * "which was designated a World Heritage in Danger in July 2006" - I don't think "a World Heritage in Danger" works. Suggest "which was added to the List of World Heritage in Danger in July 2006"
 * "It serves as a burial place of German emperors for almost 300 years" => "It served as a burial place of German emperors for almost 300 years"
 * "They are the prominent example of a large princely residence" => "They are a prominent example of a large princely residence"
 * "monopolised trade in much of the Northern Europe until the 16th century" => "monopolised trade in much of Northern Europe until the 16th century"
 * "additional areas were addedd to the site in 1992 and 1999" => "additional areas were added to the site in 1992 and 1999"
 * "This site comprises six buildigns" => "This site comprises six buildings"
 * "Among the many artists and writers" => "Among many artists and writers"
 * "majority of the today's structure dates to the 19th century." => "majority of today's structure date to the 19th century."
 * "home to the species such as" => "home to species such as"
 * "the factory manufacturing shoe last" => "the factory manufacturing shoe lasts"
 * "The famous feature of the choir are" => "The famous feature of the choir is"
 * "The latter were for generations prevented to practice their traditions" => "The latter were for generations prevented from practising their traditions"
 * "the site was placed to the List of World Heritage in Danger in 2006" => "the site was placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger in 2006" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:13, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Fixed all, thanks! Tone 10:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  22:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.