Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Peru/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 08:17, 3 November 2010.

List of World Heritage Sites in Peru

 * Nominator(s):  Grsz 11  19:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meet all of the featured list criteria. It is modeled after List of World Heritage Sites in Spain, a recently promoted FL.  Grsz 11  19:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 22:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

bamse (talk) 23:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments'
 * Should the "Image" column be mentioned in the itemized list before the main table?
 * I was told in one of my former FLC, to wikilink publishers in references. Not sure if it is (still) a requirement.
 * To the first, I don't think. I don't think it would be necessary for the reader. To the second, I've been told it isn't, so I'm not positive.  Grsz 11  22:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Has Bamse been asked to revisit? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Now, yes.  Grsz 11  22:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record, wikilinks are not necessary for the publishers. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply. Everything fine as far as these two things are concerned. Unfortunately I don't have the time for a full review this time and therefore prefer to stay neutral. bamse (talk) 00:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. Parutakupiu (talk) 22:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. After I copy-edited it, I think, it satisfies FL criteria. Ruslik_ Zero 14:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support:everything is k-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Ref 12 is dead. Ref 27 lists a full date I was wondering why you've chosen to only include the year in the article. Afro  ( Talk ) 20:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ref 12: I provided a different link that leads to the same work.  Grsz 11  21:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I see no problem with the list. Afro  ( Talk ) 01:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Not that this detracts from my support, but I find it odd that after mentioning extreme weather conditions in the lead, the somewhat more mundane weather risks to Chan Chan, the only endangered site on the list, are not also called out. (I know, it probably doesn't rain much at Chan Chan.)  Magic ♪piano 20:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I coudn't find much particularly on Chan Chan. I think the issue is that just rain in general is damaging.  Grsz 11  14:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.