Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia

 * Nominator(s): Tone 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Following some related FL examples, such as the List of World Heritage Sites in Slovenia, I believe this list meets all criteria. Some prose tweaks may be required but I expect this to be sorted during the nomination process. Tone 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * As I mentioned for the Croatia list, there's no need for a 'Shared with' column. The description of the graveyards already has the other countries in the description, and the frontiers of the Roman Empire could easily include it. Reywas92Talk 01:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Probably it's for the best if this part of discussion continues at Croatia list, the outcome should be of course applicable to both. --Tone 06:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Comment as I noted at the Croatia list, this can't be sorted chronologically. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As a side note, the list has now been adjusted to follow the style of Slovenia and Croatia. --Tone 19:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments from BeatlesLedTV
 * Center the year columns.
 * Center the image columns, or at the the Start Ras image. Looks weird left aligned.
 * Done! --Tone 22:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Support – Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Support—I also added one more as of template for good measure :) --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Support – All of my concerns have been addressed and I believe this meets FL standards. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; I'm not a fan of including the website address in the references but you're using it consistently and also have the organization name, so it's not opposable. Promoting. -- Pres N  14:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.