Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in South Korea/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in South Korea

 * Nominator(s): Tone 17:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

South Korea has 15 World Heritage Sites, among them there are several temples, palaces, castles, as well as natural features. Standard style for WHS lists. The other nomination currently open, the list for Malaysia, is already seeing some support, so I am adding a new one. Tone 17:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * "It was burned down during the Japanese invasion in the 16th century, soon after reconstructed" => "It was burned down during the Japanese invasion in the 16th century, but reconstructed soon afterwards"
 * "The fortress has remained largely intact to present day" => "The fortress has remained largely intact to the present day"
 * "The excavations of the tombs produces rich gold" => "The excavation of the tombs produced rich gold"
 * "It contains a lake-filled crater, waterfalls, and exhibits" => "It contains a lake-filled crater and waterfalls, and exhibits"
 * "The ancestor worship rituals were held regularly" => "Ancestor worship rituals were held regularly"
 * "The setting of the villages in the mountainous setting" - can we avoid saying "setting" twice? Suggest replacing the second one with "location"
 * "Over 400 kilns have operated in the area, some of them have been preserved" => "Over 400 kilns have operated in the area, some of which have been preserved"
 * "It is important stop" => "It is an important stop"
 * "Even if they shared similar culture" => "Although they shared similar culture"
 * "Even if it fell into disrepair" => "Although it fell into disrepair" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Fixed all, thanks for checking! Tone 20:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by RunningTiger123
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * "Two sites are natural, these are Getbol and the Jeju Volcanic Island and Lava Tubes." – comma splice
 * Still a comma splice
 * "80 000 wooden printing blocks" – per MOS:DIGITS, if you use spaces to group numbers, use or
 * Template not used correctly (see documentation)
 * "South North" – I'm guessing the linked words got messed up on this one?
 * Link for South Jeolla actually points to North Jeolla now
 * IABot missed a few sources when archiving


 * Good catch, thanks! Fixed. The bot is currently not responding, I will try later. Not sure why it did not archive all sources, I think it sometimes does that. Tone 08:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Replies above. RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Oops, not sure what I was doing yesterday :) Second try, please check. Tone 12:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The comma splice still wasn't fixed, but I took care of it. Everything else is good; happy to support now. RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Support, 10/10 good stuff. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Source review by Vami
I'll keep this simple: this is an easy support. – ♠Vamí _IV†♠  14:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Every citation is to UNESCO itself. As such, the sources are reliable. – ♠Vamí _IV†♠  14:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * For this occasion, I will assume good faith and forego the spotcheck. – ♠Vamí _IV†♠  14:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  00:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.