Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Sweden/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Sweden

 * Nominator(s): Tone 19:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

So, this is the last from the set of UNESCO lists from Northern Europe, and it is also the longest (probably this is the reason this came last...) Style is consistent with other lists, text usually gets some polishing during the nomination. Thank you in advance for comments. Tone 19:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Support – I made two minor tweaks and everything now checks out fine. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria.  Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: I am participating in the WikiCup, and intend to claim points from the above review. —Bloom6132 (talk) 17:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Further comments
 * The listing for the Royal Domain still uses the word "ensemble" without explaining it. I have literally no idea what the word means in this context.
 * Think that's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Support good enough now, cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!&#33;!&#33;) 08:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass
Doing now. I'll try to come back later for additional comments on the prose to get this nomination moving. Aza24 (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Ref 9 could do with some kind of identifier. Url, doi, JSTOR number, oclc or ISSN (although I'm not sure journals have these two)
 * Ref 10 needs ISBN 13 (use the converter)
 * OUP really should be spelled out as Oxford University Press
 * Given that so many sources are Unesco, reliability is fine. The other 3 are good as well. Aza24 (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * done! could you check my fixes from the previous round? --Tone 15:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Good work, pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Comments Support from Aza24
Some comments to get this one moving:
 * "The property dates back to the 17th and 18th century" – shouldn't it just be 17th? Or is this referencing some additions that were made in the 18th century
 * I'm not sure that "Nevertheless, the royal residence" makes sense since the sentence proceeding it is referring to Birka and the new one is reffering to Hovgården – they aren't seemingly related except by proximity, right?
 * in the Engelsberg Ironworks section, three sentences in a row start with "The" and one sentence after another one does as well – try to add a little variation here
 * BCE is used and so is AD, it should be either BCE and CE or BC and AD
 * Could "They depict humans, animals, weapons, tools, and other subjects. There are around 1500 known sites with carvings." be combined - might flow better?(e.g. "There are around 1500 known sites with carvings depicting humans, animals...")
 * "Skogskyrkogården is a significant example of how architectural features can be wholly integrated into the environment. Skogskyrkogården has had a profound influence on cemetery design in many countries worldwide" may flow better combined too, but this one seems less obvious than my suggestion above (e.g. "Skogskyrkogården is a significant example of how architectural features can be wholly integrated into the environment and has had...")
 * "Swedish Baroque city" sounds like a historical time period when it refers to an artistic one, this should be rephrased to something like "Swedish city in the Baroque style" (like how its done with NeoClassical later)
 * It was founded in 1680, during the reign of king Charles XI to replace Stockholm as the new naval base for Swedish Navy, a major naval power of the era. – combining would make sense since surely this is the reason the king founded it? – King should be capitalized as well
 * The rest of the prose looks great, just these things and hopefully a solution for the above issue on map size... Aza24 (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thanks for great comments. Also, I think that the fix to the space works nice - the laptop screen does not show excessively large white space now. I will let decide if this is ok or if we should add perhaps a gallery or something. --Tone 11:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes I think the way it stands right now or with a gallery is enough for me to support, great work here. Aza24 (talk) 19:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:10, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.