Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Ukraine/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Ukraine

 * Nominator(s): Tone 09:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Ukraine has 7 WH sites and 17 sites on the tentative list. The style is standard. Two of the tentative sites have no explanation in the UNESCO source (they are rather old nominations) so I don't want to speculate on the significance. The nomination of Russia is already seeing some support so I am comfortable in adding a new one. I know I said I'd nominate Italy next but that article still needs some work. Tone 09:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Content review from AryKun
 * "and one, the" → "and one of which, the"
 * You use the spelling L'viv, while our article on the city uses Lviv?
 * "its medieval topography" → I would link "topography".
 * "interactions of different communities" → "interactions of the different communities"
 * "segment of a meridian" → Link "meridian".
 * "In addition to the sites inscribed on the World Heritage list" → ""In addition to the sites on the World Heritage list"
 * "9th-13th centuries" → Should have an en-dash (–).
 * "2 thousand plant species" → "two thousand plant species"
 * "quarters of the khans" → "quarters of the Khans"
 * "in constructivist style" → "in the constructivist style"
 * That's all I can find, good job on yet another excellent list. AryKun (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thank you for the review! The original source uses L'viv but since our articles have Lviv, I changed everywhere to avoid confusion. --Tone 21:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Nothing else I could find, so support. AryKun (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * "The architecture of the city represents a fusion of styles form Eastern Europe" - presume that should say "from" not "form"?
 * "No description provided in the nomination documentation." - this is not a complete sentence so should not have a full stop
 * "The construction of the English landscape park started in 1796 by Stanisław Szczęsny Potocki." => "The construction of the English landscape park was started in 1796 by Stanisław Szczęsny Potocki."
 * "It served as the residence of Crimean Khans for around next 250 years" => "It served as the residence of Crimean Khans for around 250 years"
 * "This archeological site encompasses" - everywhere else in the article you use the spelling "archaeological"
 * "Sudak declined in the importance" => "Sudak declined in importance"
 * That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Fixed all, thanks! --Tone 18:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments Support by Gerald Waldo Luis
Yes.  Gerald WL  21:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Support. Another amazing work! And very interesting timing.  Gerald WL  08:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Source review
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ref#1: Link archived in 2016, retrieved in 2010?
 * This is probably fine, as this is a general UNESCO reference.
 * Suggesting to be consistent whether the titles of web pages need to be in title case or sentence case. We have both "Ancient City of Tauric Chersonese and its Chora" and "The historical surroundings of Crimean Khans' capital in Bakhchysarai"
 * I am following the source, including the capitalizations and quotes.
 * "National Steppe Biosphere Reserve "Askaniya Nowa"", "Archaeological Site "Stone Tomb"", etc. — I guess that quotes inside quotes take single quotations.
 * You mean in the references? This is the way this is formatted, but I agree it looks awkward. I'd leave it as it is.
 * MOS:QUOTEINQUOTE supports quotes-in-quotes to be single quote marks. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "of the 6th - 16th c." " — should be en-dash
 * Fixed.
 * "while still officially being a Union Republic of the Soviet Union (prior to its dissolution in 1991)." — source?
 * Ukraine ratified the convention per 1988 source. Should I source the fact that the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991?
 * If it is in the article, then yes, it needs to be cited. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Rest, everything looks good. The set precedent is that UNESCO sources are fine for UNESCO lists.
 * Side note: Can we have a better short description than "Wikipedia list article"?
 * I'm not the one adding those, but I am open to suggestions :)
 * Side note 2: Really nice timing!
 * Comments addressed, please check. Thank you for the review! --Tone 10:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Fixed the rest! --Tone 16:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I made a few changes, rest looks good. Pass for source review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  16:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.