Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Rally Championship Drivers' Champions


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:51, 13 December 2008.

List of World Rally Championship Drivers' Champions
I am nominating this list for featured standard as I believe it fulfils the criteria. It is well-referenced, up to date and accurate. The tables are sortable and their are images used to illustrate the list. Thanks in advance or your comments. NapHit (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * All my comments have been resolved. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Sources looks good, checked with the Checklinks tool. Canniba  loki  04:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - Comments were resolved to comply with pWP:WIAFL.--SRX 00:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Not keen on the headings "By nationality" etc - should be "Winners by nationality" or else put these as subsections under a general "Winners" heading.
 * Gronholm's caption is fragment so remove the full stop.
 * The notes aren't cited. Is there a reason for this?
 * "The margin of points the champions beat the runner-up by" - try "The margin of points by which the champion defeated the runner-up(s)" perhaps? Was there ever more than one runner-up?
 * The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 06:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment Rambling Man, they are all dealt with now NapHit (talk) 14:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Support with one comment; "...follows: 10, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1." From my perspective, numbers 10 and lower should be written in lower case, but it's fine to me. Nice job with the article. --  SRE.K.A nnoyomous .L. 24 [c] 01:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I fell that because these are describing a point system, they should remain numerals. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeh I agree with Dabomb because it's dscribing a points system it should remain. NapHit (talk) 15:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.