Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of York City F.C. players (fewer than 25 appearances)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 10:14, 7 August 2015.

List of York City F.C. players (fewer than 25 appearances)

 * Nominator(s): Mattythewhite (talk) 21:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the criteria. It is the last of a three-part series including List of York City F.C. players (featured since October 2007) and List of York City F.C. players (25–99 appearances) (featured since March 2015). I am working on reducing the number of red links, although I feel criterion 5a is met as it is. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Fantastic work, well done. NapHit (talk) 11:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment – The one thing that jumped out at me was the Players with 25 or more appearances section, which is basically just a hatnote to other articles. Since links to the other pages are included in the templates at the bottom of the page, I'm not sure we need a blank section for them. If you feel that they are important enough to highlight, perhaps they should be at the top of the page. Otherwise, the list looked strong to me. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 19:22, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I placed the links to the other lists there as I thought readers would find them useful upon finishing reading the list. However, I wouldn't oppose them being moved to the top of the page if you feel it is more practical. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - no issues jump out at me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Support. As stated above under the yellow stripe, I expected to support, and nominator responded to my comments in a very timely manner, which is more than can be said for my belated return to this FLC. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - feels this satisfies the criteria based on prose and structure alone. Couldn't find any issues with references. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * – SchroCat (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.