Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Aadukalam/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 00:53, 26 August 2015.

List of accolades received by Aadukalam

 * Nominator(s): — Ssven2  Speak 2 me  07:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)''

This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2011 Indian Tamil drama film, Aadukalam starring Dhanush and Taapsee Pannu. This film is notable for garnering Dhanush and Vetrimaaran several awards and nominations. It is my second attempt at FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 07:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Oppose – Sorry I see a 3(b) violation here. The size of the parent article is just over 8k chars (1.3k words). I see no point in splitting the awards page unless the main article is expanded by a sizeable fold. Besides, your previous candidate has two opposes with a few outstanding concerns still left. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 12:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. Thanks for making me aware of it. If that's the case, should I withdraw the nomination? — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 12:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have a final say here. So wait for others opinion. Cheers &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 12:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm retracting my oppose as Ssven2 has expanded the parent article. Although my rule-of-thumb is 12k chars, this looks fine for me. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 05:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Support I'm going to have to disagree with Vensatry on this. I think the table is just long enough to qualify for a separate article. It would look excessively bloated in the main article. It's a well sourced list which looks near FL criteria to me.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The issue here is not with this list, but with the parent article. As pointed out earlier, since the size of the parent article hovers around 8k chars, I see no point in forking this list out of it. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 19:11, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * But Ssven has stated that Aadukalam will be a future GA for him, so he will expand it to who-knows-what-length. And the film, being a multiple NFA winner, will definitely have at least 100 news sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * So this list can well be nominated when the parent article gets expanded long enough. Whether or not, it becomes a GA isn't an issue. &mdash; Vensatry  (ping) 09:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Also, I don't understand why would it "bloat" the main article, when the prose part of this list can easily be covered there. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 19:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from FrB.TG

 * Support – after an exhaustive and comprehensive review, I can't find anything else to fault. --  Frankie talk 12:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Frankie. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 13:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from West Virginian

 * Support:, I find that this article meets both the criteria outlined at Featured list criteria and Manual of Style/Lead section. This list is in keeping with other Featured Lists of accolades received by Indian films, and it does not stray from the successful formula. I have no other comments or suggestions, as they have all been addressed by . Thank you for your good work on this article, and for your continued contributions to Wikipedia! -- West Virginian   (talk)  23:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, West Virginian! — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 01:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.