Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:03, 28 September 2014.

List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine

 * Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Blue Jasmine was a particular highlight of last year primarily for Cate Blanchett's performance in the film. Here is the accolades list for it, as always, I welcome all the helpful suggestions and comments for improvements. Cowlibob (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by TriiipleThreat

 * Table: The bottom note does not point to anything. You should either add to the Ceremony header or replace the note reference with a asterisk.


 * References: You should strongly consider archiving your references in order to prevent WP:LINKROT. There are many services you can use, I personally prefer WebCite. Its very simple and only takes minutes.

Overall its a very good list; well organized table, well referenced, and the lead does a good job summarizing the topic.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments. I've added a note to the date of ceremony column and archived all the references. Cowlibob (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Support. Good job!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Support – meets the standards! --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I've fixed all the issues you highlighted I think. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Support &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 01:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments from SchroCat

 * I'm not a big fan of rowspans as there are access issues with them (see Avoiding rowspan/colspan), but I'm not sure that is an enforceable criteria.
 * Be consistent in your spacings in refs: some have " ' and some have "' (compare FNs 11 and 14, but there are others)
 * Be consistent in providing publisher details: you do for some, but there are a lot of gaps

That's it from me: very slender fare for a well put together list. - SchroCat (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I've fixed the spacing and added publishers wherever possible. I don't know if it helps that the rows return after the column is sorted. Cowlibob (talk) 10:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Support: Well done once again, though I am not sure if describing the film as a "comedy-drama" is apt. I think it has been generally described as a drama. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  07:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * It's not a pure comedy but I've seen it described as a black comedy which I've changed in the lead as well. Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 10:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Support: Looks consistent with all the other film accolade lists that are featured articles.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 06:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 19:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.