Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Dabangg/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:31, 27 November 2012.

List of accolades received by Dabangg

 * Nominator(s): Greatuser (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because... I believe it meets the FL criteria, The list is complete for every awards each Reliable source is provided etc etc.. Greatuser (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC) undefined — Bill william compton Talk   09:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * Data should be in tabular format.
 * Negligence of MOS, which includes but not limited to date formats, dashes, WP:MOSNUM, etc.
 * Overreliance on Bollywood Hungama and paucity of reliable sources.
 * Inadequate prose quality.
 * Solid oppose: As creator of this article, I can say without doubt that this article is nowhere near featured list criteria and fails several conditions, the least of which is the quality of sources. Bill has given some good points which need to be addressed and this is a premature nomination. I even doubt if the article has potential to be a featured list. Secret of success  ·  talk  14:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose per poor prose quality. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose on prose; doesn't have very good quality. TBrandley 22:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose: Prose is extremely poor and sources are unreliable/not formatted properly. An extremely premature nomination. S.M.A.R.O.J.I.T (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Biggest oppose in history: Per above. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.