Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Enthiran/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 00:53, 26 August 2015.

List of accolades received by Enthiran

 * Nominator(s): — Ssven2  Speak 2 me  12:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)''

This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2010 Indian Tamil science fiction film, Enthiran starring Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. This is the first Tamil film list to be attempted for FL and also the first time I'm nominating an article for FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 12:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Vensatry

 * Support - Meets the standards. Nicely improved since my previous visit &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 15:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the thorough review, Vensatry! Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 06:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from West Virginian

 * The image of Rajinikanth is licensed CC BY 3.0, so it is acceptable for use here.
 * The first sentence of the article's lede needs to have an inline citation that verifies S. Shankar as the director and Kalanithi Maran as the producer.
 * Done as asked. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 00:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I suggest adding an and behind the semicolon in the third sentence of the lede's first paragraph.
 * I wrote "The film stars Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan in the lead roles with Danny Denzongpa, Santhanam, and Karunas playing supporting roles." If that's alright. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 07:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Please ensure to use an Oxford comma consistently throughout the lede, as it is not used in the third sentence, but is used in the fourth sentence.
 * Done as asked. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 07:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Rather than "The film was dubbed into Hindi as Robot," consider "The film was dubbed in Hindi as Robot."
 * Done as asked. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 00:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * "Produced on an estimated budget..." vs. "Made on an estimated budget..." Produced sounds more professional here.
 * Done as asked. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 00:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I suggest inserting an Oxford comma in the sentence outlining areas of "particular praise."
 * Done as asked. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 07:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * If the National Film Awards are not always held in New Delhi, I would mention that New Delhi was the venue for the ceremony along with the year.
 * Done as asked. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 00:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Is there an inline citation for the final sentence of the third paragraph?
 * Yes, the citations are available in the list. I want to keep the information in the lead like other Indian film award FLs. I'll add the citations if you want me to do so. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 07:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I am surprised there are not more Tamil language sources referenced here. I would engage in a cursory search of Tamil language media sources to see if there are any other sources out there to include here.
 * Not much reliable tamil newspaper/magazine/website sources (online) cover the award ceremonies. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 11:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * , these are my only comments thus far. Overall, I asses this list to meet several of the criteria for Featured list criteria and Manual of Style/Lead section. Once these items have been addressed, we'll go from there, and I'll engage in a re-review before making a final decision. Thank you for all your hard work on this list. -- West Virginian   (talk)  18:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support:, thank you for addressing all my concerns in a timely manner. While this is a short list, it would make the article for the film much too long if this list were added to it. With that said, this list is quite comprehensive for the subject matter, and I support its progression to FL status. Thank you for all your work on this one! -- West Virginian   (talk)  12:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, West Virginian! Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 03:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment from Azealia911

 * Before I start a thorough review, I just want to say, this article doesn't seem very necessary, just over 30 awards from a mere six award shows amassing to a total of less than twenty references for the entire article, what's stopping this table from being slipped into the main article? It seems somewhat fork-y from my point of view.  Azealia 911  talk  22:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The main article faced length issues, especially during its first FAC. That's why the awards section has a separate article. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 01:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * But...you created the awards article in February 2015, and you didn't nominate the main article for FA until March 2015 for the first time, so how exactly was it an issue? After reading over some of the issues presented at the main articles nomination for the first time concerning length, it seems that issues were to do with repetition of language, as opposed to that the article was too bulky. There's nothing wrong with a long article, so long as it doesn't waffle, which is what the editor took issue with, I really don't see any issue merging the table into the awards section. I'm not going to review this, sorry to say, and currently take the stance of  oppose, withdraw and merge , per this being an unnecessary split. I could be otherwise persuaded though, but at this point I'm not seeing enough notable information concerning awards for a stand-alone list.  Azealia 911   talk  01:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree. Although there is no specific rule on the limit, an accolades list with 15+ awards and close to 30 nominations is definitely a legitimate fork. You may want to see similar FLs with less than 15 awards. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 07:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The length was actually discussed during the main article's first peer review. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 10:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * By giving the awards a separate article, the main article became concise enough to to pass its FAC. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from FrB.TG

 * Support – nice work on your first list. -- Frankie  talk 13:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Frankie. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 13:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Support from Dr. Blofeld

 * Support Looks a decent list to me.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Doc. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 02:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Vivvt

 * Support Good work overall. -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 04:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Vivvt. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 05:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.