Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC).

List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2

 * Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 00:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

After List of accolades received by Avengers: Endgame was promoted to featured list and appeared on the Main Page on January 18, 2021, I will do the same as this page. It is the another send-off to any franchise/series I wish to appear in the Main Page also. Chompy Ace 00:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Drive-by comment
 * "It went on to win two awards, including Best Sound and Best Makeup." - you can't say "it won N awards, including...." and then list all N. "Including" by definition indicates that what follows isn't the entire list -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * , done. Chompy Ace 21:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you there? Chompy Ace 10:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I am now (briefly).....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. What about now? Chompy Ace 13:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. I've skimmed the prose and made minor edits; nothing big jumps out at me. Feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seems fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by RunningTiger123
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I would either exclude the AFI Award or add the comparable award from the National Board of Review recognizing the entire franchise (for consistency).
 * "Best Art Direction for a Fantasy Film" should capitalize "Film"
 * As best as I can tell, the Critics' Choice Awards for makeup and visual effects did not nominate specific individuals.
 * "Room of Requirement" should not capitalize "of"
 * "The Ultimate Scream" should sort by "Ultimate"
 * , done. Chompy Ace 08:10, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Source review – The references are reliable and well-formatted across the board, and no dead links were found by the link-checker tool. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Support - I can't find any new problems with the list. Great job.
 * -- Birdienest81 talk  11:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.