Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Koi... Mil Gaya/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC).

List of accolades received by Koi... Mil Gaya

 * Nominator(s): Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Koi... Mil Gaya is one of the earliest science fiction films from India, with its star Hrithik Roshan receiving appreciation from the audience, critics, and award groups. The film is also popular in other countries, especially in my country Indonesia. I nominated this list because I believe it is comprehensive enough. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Photo caption needs a full stop
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "the film revolves on Rohit" => "the film focusses on Rohit"
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "who comes in contact" => "who comes into contact"
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "with the computer of his late father" => "by using the computer of his late father"
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "In addition to write the film's story" => "In addition to writing the film's story"
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "Rakesh Roshan also done its screenplay" => "Rakesh Roshan also created its screenplay"
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "Produced on a budget between" => "Produced on a budget of between"
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * In the table, 	"Idhar Chala Mein" should disregard the quote marks and sort under I.
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It still sorts at the top.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * That's what I got on a first pass.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
 * The table needs a caption, e.g. at the top of the table code add "|+ " or, if that caption would duplicate a nearby header, you can make it only for screen reader software like "|+ ". Captions allow screen reader software to jump to tables by name. -- Pres  N  14:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * No need for the year in the infobox caption
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Sources 2 and 3 seem to be about the cast and crew, so how do they support the claim that it received "positive reviews"?
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Eight Rotten Tomatoes reviews is too few to be meaningful (see Review aggregators)
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * it also got → it also received
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The date 20–22 May 2004 doesn't sort correctly (ranges of dates aren't automatically recognized as dates)
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hrithik Roshan, Rakesh Roshan, Rajesh Roshan, and Johnny Lever are not sorted correctly
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * First names also need to be considered – so "Hrithik" should sort before "Rajesh", which in turn should sort before "Rakesh"


 * Source 23 is from Getty Images, which I highly doubt is relevant to this article
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I would not stack references vertically as they are currently listed in the table. When the table is sorted in any way, it splits merged cells, so the references makes each cell unnecessarily tall and limit how much can be shown. Instead, I would place the sources for each award next to each other horizontally, or if that would make the cell too wide, place them into a single ref tag as a list.
 * Like this? —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly.

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Could a be employed instead of bundling refs together? — DaxServer (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No. The reviewer agrees with the current form, and I also agree with it too. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments above. Also, one more note: fixed image sizes are discouraged per MOS:IMGSIZE, so change the infobox image to use relative scaling. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Image review Pass
 * The only image File:Hrithik at Rado launch.jpg is licenced under CC Attr 3.0, and reviewed in an OTRS ticket. Pass for image licencing.  Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Source review – Pass
Doing now. Aza24 (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Version reviewed:


 * Formatting
 * For the refs with more than one citation (7 and 8 for example), I recommend putting  in between them to differentiate them better
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The Associated Press is the author, not the publisher
 * Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Reliability
 * Fine overall


 * Verifiability
 * Looks good.
 * No real issues, so pass for source review. Though I still recommend considering my first point. Aza24 (talk) 20:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * There was an edit to the image size in August, prompted by a (correct) point made by an FLC reviewer, that had the effect of squeezing the table and creating a lot of white space. I think I've fixed it, but let me know if you don't like how it looks now.
 * I checked sorting on all sortable columns; it's not a problem for me that the various Roshans are out of order ... sorting on last name only is fine by me ... but I'm bringing it up because some reviewers care about these things.
 * I added "lk=on" to create a link to Indian rupee, but I haven't been keeping up on copyediting issues like I used to ... revert if that's not right.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The table coding seems fine. I sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seems fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 17:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.