Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:45, 29 August 2011.

List of accolades received by Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

 * Nominator(s):  R uby2010   comment!  03:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the criteria. For the most part, I've attempted to double source the awards using one primary and one secondary citation (some were difficult to find one RS, let alone two). Hope everyone enjoys reading about the second best film of 2003!  R uby2010  comment!  03:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Support after some minor tweaks. Another great FL contribution from Ruby. Crystal Clear x3 00:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Reference 43, what is happening with the directing?
 * You mean the direction to IMDb? The primary website for the actual award tells visitors to see the winners at IMDb. I thought the ref formatting I provided seemed the best way to indicate this (with Crystal's apparent agreement).  R uby2010   comment!  04:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not exactly sure how reliable it would be if the source is asking us to look over to IMDB.
 * Well it's the direct website for the Motion Picture Sound Editors, so the site is reliable. It looks like they're under construction, and are using IMDb until the website is finished. That's a good indicator of how reliable IMDb is in this case, if I ever saw one. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  14:13, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Have you archived the award lists in general? They tend to go red pretty fast. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 11:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do so soon  R uby2010   comment!  14:13, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Just an update: am working on archiving, and will continue in coming days. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  15:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC) All done (with one or two exceptions that were unable or not allowed to be archived, like Empire Online). Thanks,   R uby2010   comment!  17:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I think the list is of fine quality now, and passes FLC? criterias. I am happy to support it. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 11:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - Looks great, I see no further problems preventing FL status. Good job. DrNegative (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmmm I am surprised all the prior reviewers missed this, but the dates in "date of ceremony" column are not consistent; some are ymd, some dmy, etc, some have commas some don't, etc. They should all be consistent. Pumpkin Sky   talk  00:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Good catch. Fixed  R uby2010   comment!  01:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. I was just wondering why the dates in the table are dmy, but the dates in the references (and lead) aren't in the same format? - JuneGloom    Talk  15:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I recently converted all the table dates to DMY, but forgot to check the lead. Thanks for catching it.  R uby2010   comment!  15:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.