Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Neerja/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC).

List of accolades received by Neerja

 * Nominator(s): Mr. Smart  LION  11:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by 2016 Indian film Neerja, which is one of the best films of 2016. As of now, the film has won 39 awards, which is not a less number for a film to win awards. Please kindly note that I didn't nominate the list for peer review, because I believe that the list is currently meeting at least 70% FL criteria. I will bring this percentage to 99, if issues are raised here. I hope to receive constructive comments for the same. Mr. Smart  LION  11:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

These are a few points that jump out for me when I read through the list once. You have done an excellent job with this, and I will provide a more complete review once my comments are addressed above. My review will primarily be focused on the lead and the prose just so you know. Aoba47 (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments from Aoba47
 * I would include this in the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Awards and prizes, WikiProject Film and WikiProject Lists.
 * Is there any particular reason why you are not include the typical infobox used in these types of lists? (i.e. as seen in these two lists List of accolades received by Aadukalam and List of accolades received by 12 Years a Slave (film)?
 * I would recommend adding citations for everything in the last paragraph of the lead.
 * The title in Reference 12 should not be in all caps.
 * Thanks for reviewing the list and for your comments. I have addressed your first, third and fourth comments. As for your second comment, my answer is yes. Check the Featured lists in the "Recognized content" box in Portal:Bollywood. None of them has an infobox. So I copied their style. Waiting to hear your complete review. Mr. Smart  LION  05:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing my comments; I will leave the infobox question up to other reviewers as I think it is fine without one. I support this for promotion.f possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could look at my current FLC? Either way, have a wonderful rest of your day. Aoba47 (talk) 02:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for supporting this list for promotion. And I looked at your current FLC. Though I've not fully gone through it, but it's looking great. All the best for your FLC. Mr. Smart  LION  04:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Kapoor was fantastic in this fantastic thriller.
 * Comments
 * Regardless of how Bollywood accolades are, an infobox is needed to give an overview of the awards received by the film. See similar lists at WP:FL. The WP:DISINFOBOX in Bollywood lists was a result of some early discussions as it was thought to have confused the reader instead of helping. However, I disagree now.
 * "served as the stunt director for the film.[5][1]" => "..the film.[1][5]" (shift the references).
 * Mumbai, Karachi, Pakistan - WP:OVERLINKING.
 * "As of 15 July 2017, the film has won 39 awards" - I would cut the as of part since it is unlikely the film will receive more (competitive) awards in the future.
 * "The film won two awards: Best Feature Film in Hindi and a Special Jury Award for Kapoor—at the 64th ceremony of India's National Film Awards" would better work as "the film won two awards at the 64th ceremony of India's National Film Awards—Best Feature Film in Hindi and Special Jury Award for Kapoor".
 * "At the 62nd Filmfare Awards ceremony" - cut ceremony to avoid repetition.
 * " including Critics Award for Best film and Critics Award for Best Actress" => "including Best Film (Critics) and Best Actress (Critics)".
 * "Neerja was voted the most liked female-centric film of 2016" - according to whom, by whom? Somewhat WP:WEASEL-y.
 * Ref 8 and 13 - wikilink India Today in first instance and de-link in the next.
 * Ref 9 and 10 - ditto.
 * Ref 12 and 18 ^^
 * Ref 19 is incomplete. – FrB.TG (talk) 21:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * ✅ I've resolved all the issues. Mr. Smart  LION  06:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Not quite


 * Mumbai, Karachi, Pakistan still not de-linked. In addition, there is now Indian that borders on overlinking.
 * I did not ask you to remove this altogether, just some explanation was needed. Was it voted the most liked female-centric film of 2016 in a poll by a critic?
 * Ref 18 needs accessdate. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done except the second one. As for the second one, I searched on Google, but I could not found the answer to "Was it voted the most liked female-centric film of 2016 in a poll by a critic?". So I thought that it would be better to remove the sentence. Mr. Smart  LION  05:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You didn't need to Google. Just looking into the source for the answer would have done, but it does not seem like a relevant info anyway.


 * Support FrB.TG (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Mr. Smart  LION  07:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comments from Yashthepunisher

Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Link Saiwyn Quadras.
 * How relevant is it to mention the stunt director's name here? I don't see any such mentions in previous FL's.
 * "Set in Mumbai"? But the whole film takes place inside a plane which was in Karachi.
 * The alt text is quite messy.
 * Ref 5 is missing the authors name.
 * These links needs to be fixed.
 * ✅ Mr. Smart  LION  06:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for spending your precious time in reviewing this list and also for supporting it for FL. Have a great day ahead! Mr. Smart  LION  13:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Made a couple small changes; source review passed. Promoting. -- Pres N  15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.