Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Paradesi (2013 film)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC).

List of accolades received by Paradesi (2013 film)

 * Nominator(s): —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2013 Indian Tamil period drama film, Paradesi starring Atharvaa and Vedhika. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members several awards and nominations. It is my fifth attempt at a accolades FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comments from Kailash
 * the cinematography and editing were respectively handled by Chezhiyan and Kishore Te. "respectively" may come last.
 * Anything more formal and non-biased than "in a hellish manner"?
 * You could add the INR Convert template for ₹400 million, or a note regarding the exchange rate (wish INR Convert was always accurate).
 * When you say the film was nominated for/won x number of awards, major ones (producing, directing, acting and writing) should always be mentioned. I don't see the lead mentioning Vedhika being nominated for Best Actress at Filmfare, or Atharvaa being nominated for Best Actor at Vijay.
 * Poornima Ramasamy won for Best Costume Design at the 60th National Film Awards - could you say "At the 60th National Film Awards, Poornima Ramasamy won in the category for Best Costume Design"? -- Kailash29792 (talk)  11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have hopefully resolved your comments. Do let me know if there's anything else. Thanks. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, and this FLC has my support. Kailash29792 (talk)  11:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Kailash. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Comment - It's hardly been three days since your last nomination. Also, the unwritten rule is that a nomination must have a minimum of three supports with no outstanding concerns. — Vensatry (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * why don't you review Featured list candidates/Hong Kong Film Award for Best Actress/archive1? This one has received only 2 reviews in the past 3 months. --Skr15081997 (talk) 12:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * My other nomination now has 4 supports. Feel free to leave comments in both. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 05:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comments from Aoba47
 * Could you possibly clarify "a degrading manner"? As someone who not seen this film, I am not certain what you mean by this as it sounds a little vague. Are you referring to an extreme mistreatment akin to slavery or is it something different? Some additional context would be helpful in this case.
 * Yes, it is slavery. I have added a bit more.


 * Do you have any information on the box office of the film (how much it made) as it would be helpful to get some sort of number to show how it "failed to recover its production costs"? If it is unavailable, then it is fine as it currently stands.
 * Unfortunately, it is unavailable. If it were, I would have put it up before.

Wonderful job as always. I only have two very minor clarification questions/suggestions. Once they are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have hopefully resolved your comments. Do let me know if there's anything else. Thanks. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing my comments. Great work with this. I will support this. Good luck with getting this promoted, and with your future projects as well. Aoba47 (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Aoba47. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Anytime. Aoba47 (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Support Can't see any issue in it. Good luck. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Yash. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Comment. The prose looks good. Just have a minor comment for a reference: unless the article was originally published by IANS, I would remove it from reference 12. – FrB.TG (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I couldn't get the original IANS source though as the links die quite quickly. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Replaced with another source. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 18:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Spot-checks
 * The first reference never really directly mentions the release year.
 * Added another reference that does so. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref. 2 mentions a certain Uday Karthik in the cast, is her of any importance?
 * He's paired with Riythvika in the film and doesn't really have much to do. He doesn't have a Wikipedia article. Included him though. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref. 8 says that the film failed at BO, but never mentions anything about not being able to recover it's production costs.
 * Tweaked the sentence. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The table looks good. Fine work, as always. Numerounovedant  Talk
 * Hopefully, I have resolved your comments. Do let me know if there is anything pending. Thank you. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks good to go. Numerounovedant   Talk  16:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Vedant. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.