Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Piku/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC).

List of accolades received by Piku

 * Nominator(s): and  Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 02:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Piku is one of the best Bollywood films of last year, and one of the most awarded ones. This listing of the notable awards and nominations it received is well-sourced and I believe it meets the FL criteria. I have another open FLC at the moment, but that has received 3 supports and has no outstanding comments. Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 02:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support: It's a near flawless list but I have one issue. I'd suggest you to provide a source for the plot synopsis. Yashthepunisher (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 05:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ssven2, the BH source doesn't say much about the plot. You can add a review instead. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Added HT review. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 06:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. All my concerns are met by the nominators. Good job! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Source review (random spotchecks included)
 * All sources appear reliable and are well formatted. However, I'm a little concerned about the usage of Sulekha.com in a FL. Random spotchecks reveal no copyvio. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Is this one from Merinews ok? —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 10:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I think the Sulekha one is better than Merinews. Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 15:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * How about this source? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Many thanks Pavan!! :), all your comments have been addressed now. :) Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 16:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support, meets the standards &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 06:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the thorough review, Vensatry. :) Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 07:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Vensatry. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 07:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.