Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Precious/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 22:14, 16 April 2010.

List of accolades received by Precious

 * Nominator(s): Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 02:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel the article meets the Featured List criteria. This is the first article/list that I've made that I've ever nominated for Feature List quality, so I'm not very familiar with every detail the list needs, so I'm very sure that this article might need minor edits. Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 02:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment The summary box at the top is impossible to read. Please reformat, perhaps using List of accolades received by Avatar as an example. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed Gary King  ( talk ) 03:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. Great work!  Jujutacular  T · C 18:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 00:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Support a nice piece of work. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Support I don't have any problem with this list. All right. Tb hotch Ta lk C.  01:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments from
 * The nomination column in the info-box should contain the count of all nominations, including the nominations that eventually became wins. All award wins are still nominations as well. This also makes it easier for the reader by presenting the awards count of wins/noms as numerator/denominator.
 * Done. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 17:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


 * My personal opinion here, I feel the dates look better on the left-hand column of the list, followed by the awards which are alphabetized, and then the award "category" column. More than likely, your average reader will constantly ignore the date column in between the two as it is now when comparing what accolades where won for the particular award ceremony and it may be more of an annoyance. DrNegative (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ordering the list like that has been disputed (see resolved comments by the Rambling Man) Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 17:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have read Rambling Man's comments and I can see his point too. I guess it comes down to personal taste at this point and I am just trying to get our film-awards lists to a certain standard format so to speak. List of accolades received by Ratatouille, List of accolades received by WALL-E, and now List of accolades received by Avatar all follow the same format so I don't think we should deviate from it. However, I can't place my opinion above Rambling Man's because he makes a good point too. We need a compromise of some sort it seems. DrNegative (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to add my input, does it really matter if the date of the award ceremony is on the left or right side in the awards table; a Featured list is suppose to be about whether or not the article meets all of the FL requirements, not about "personal taste" on how the awards table should be formatted, just sayin'. Crystal Clear x3 17:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, which is why I was hoping to see this inconsistency addressed on all film awards lists. I guess you're right; this isn't the best place to settle the issue. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.