Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Star Trek/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Crisco 1492 11:04, 6 December 2014.

List of accolades received by Star Trek (film)

 * Nominator(s): Miyagawa (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've put forward a FL nom, and certainly this one is unlike any I've ever done - because the sourcing was an absolute pig!! But after digging through archive.org I've managed to put together a fully sourced list. This was originally based off the IMDB list of the awards, but in pulling this together I fixed the mistakes in that table (you'll notice that IMDB gives the film more victories - but I've gone through and checked each individual one to make sure they're all accounted for). Once this gets through then I'll take a long hard look at Star Trek Into Darkness although I'll need a drink first! :) Miyagawa (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * All good now. I can now Support this list. Cowlibob (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'd disambiguate with (film), as we could theoretically make a list for TOS and/or the franchise as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:47, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. Miyagawa (talk) 16:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Excellent, thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments from SNUGGUMS


 * Oppose..... at least for now:
 * I can't find anything in FN5 (Box Office Mojo) which supports the "which placed it as the seventh highest-grossing film for 2009 behind The Hangover" bit
 * I've added the relevant source. Sorry about that, completely overlooked the correct cite. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Within the tables, there are instances of WP:OVERLINK for award recipients
 * WP:OVERLINK allows for links to be repeated in tables. Also, because it is a sortable table, any one of them potentially could be the first link to appear in the table. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Publisher for The Boston Globe from 2006 to October 2009 was P. Steven Ainsley, so I'd reflect this accordingly
 * Thanks, rectified. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Box Office Mojo shouldn't be italicized as it is an online-only source
 * Corrected. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * FN6's publisher should be the same as FN5, which is Amazon.com
 * Corrected. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * CBS News shouldn't be italicized as it is not a print source, and publisher is CBS Corporation
 * Corrected. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Publisher for MTV is Viacom
 * Corrected. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Indiewire is owned by SnagFilms
 * Corrected. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * "Daily News" should read "New York Daily News"
 * Corrected. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I am confident that better sources can be found than "Zap2It" or "Daily Express".
 * I'd argue that both are reliable sources. In particular, the Daily Express is a national British newspaper. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not necessarily saying they're unreliable, just that higher quality ones can be used. For example, The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian are among the most reliable UK papers.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 01:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The Daily Express cite is purely used for the date of the ceremony. I'll look for a better quality source for the critic's choice awards and then post back here to confirm. Miyagawa (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Not too sure about "Moviefone"
 * It's a website owned by AOL and directly linked to from their websites. Miyagawa (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem is how AOL-affiliated sites tend not to be very reliable  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 01:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The only other source I can find is a TrekMovie.com article as the SFX website doesn't have the results listed anymore, and archive.org unfortunately didn't capture it while it did. I'm happy to use TrekMovie.com as it's one of only the four fan related websites which are linked to from the official Star Trek website, which I've always taken a sign of reliability. However, it's probably the one I've used the least as the others actually used to have articles directly linked to from the official website in a prior design. But I'm happy to either switch or add as a secondary cite if you think it'd improve the situation. Miyagawa (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * There's my input.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 23:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delay, looks better now. Almost ready to support.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 01:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


 * — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.