Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Batman (film)/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC).

List of accolades received by The Batman (film)

 * Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 06:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

After the previous nomination's archival last month, I will nominate this list again. Chompy Ace 06:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Happy to see a film scorer as the image on an awards list, it's rare you see them as the front face of major films! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 00:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC) That's all I got, very nice work on this article. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 00:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Comments from MyCatIsAChonk
 * The table is currently squished by the infobox (using Vector 2022); this could be fixed by expanding the lead by a few sentence to push it all downwards, but of course this is optional- just an idea.
 * The last column's header should say Ref(s), since some cells have multiple refs.
 * The sorting in the recipients column is off- if you sort A to Z downwards, Russell Earl comes between two Dan Lemmons, but Lemmon starts with L... what's odd is Lemmon reappears further down, in the correct alphabetical place
 * I suggest adding a caption to the table.
 * All citations should use the same casing (per MOS:CONFORMTITLE)
 * , done except for the first, fourth, and fifth comments. The first does not have any option, the fourth is handled by a screen-reader only template, and the fifth is I addressed already to apply all multimedia titles. Chompy Ace 02:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Chompy Ace Ref 1 uses sentence case. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 02:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , done. Chompy Ace 02:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 02:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Support - nothing from me. Another excellent list from  -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I agree with Chris, this is another well sorted listicle, just some comments and I'll support!  Gerald WL  08:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Comments Support from Gerald Waldo Luis
 * "it is a reboot of the Batman film franchise. The film was directed" --> "it is a reboot of the Batman film franchise directed" in my opinion this makes reading the prose flow more naturally
 * There are three continuous refs, why not place them at the sentence which it supports? Or is the paragraph everything everywhere all at once?
 * Why not add Metacritic?
 * In "Best BTS/EPK for a Feature Film (Under 2 minutes)", why not link or add a footnote for readers who don't get the terms?
 * Image review pass, good caption and alt, and also succinct rationale.
 * , done except for the third comment which is consistent among other film accolades lists (List of accolades received by Top Gun: Maverick is an example). Chompy Ace 09:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah alright, that's understandable. Well, since I have no more issues, I'mma support this piece. Good work!  Gerald WL  09:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC)


 * EN-Jungwon
 * Infobox says 9 wins. I counted 6 wins mentioned in the infobox and the main table. There are 4 runner-up mentions in the main table which is not mentioned in the infobox so the total number of wins should be 10. So in the infobox change:

That's all. --  EN  - Jungwon  14:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , done. Chompy Ace 09:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Support --  EN  - Jungwon  11:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey man im josh
 * Source review: Passed
 * Reliable enough for the information being cited
 * Consistent date formatting
 * Consistent publisher formatting
 * Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
 * Link checker shows no issues (though I did have to copy the refs to my sandbox to run the checker for some reason, as it stopped short of analyzing all the references)
 * Image review: Passed
 * Image is relevant
 * Image is appropriately licensed
 * Images has alt text

Support. Good stuff @Chompy Ace. -- Hey man im josh (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 01:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.