Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Lord of the Rings film trilogy/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 07:49, 16 April 2012.

List of accolades received by The Lord of the Rings film trilogy

 * Nominator(s):  Ruby  2010/  2013  19:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC), User:Glimmer721

I am nominating this for featured list because, after a lot of work, I believe this amazing trilogy deserves the FL star, particularly in preparation for the release of The Hobbit. Thanks in advance for your comments.  Ruby  2010/  2013  19:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Co-nominator here: This was a list I tried to improve by adding references to back in early 2011 but eventually stopped; in November I noticed Ruby had begun working on it and asked if we could collaborate. This is my first foray into featured lists so I've kind of watched and learn; hopefully I can learn from this nomination, too! Glimmer721  talk  01:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Support &mdash; Looks very good. Jimknut (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

More comments
 * This looks good to me, great work. But please check for double links to WP articles in the plain text and the awards tables. E.g. Andy Serkis has been linked several times. De728631 (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Think I straightened this out with Fellowship--do you want things linked again for the other two movies? Glimmer721  talk  22:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Ucucha/duplinks.js is useful for checking this, if you need it. To jump in on this comment, the only link I think should be repeated under each film's headings would be the link for the film in question—for instance, if The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is linked earlier in the article, it should still be linked in the heading for its awards. GRAPPLE   X  22:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Support. Been keeping an eye on this one and its progress, and provided my tweaks here and there don't qualify as active involvement then I'm happy to support it for featured status. GRAPPLE   X  11:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Aside from these issues, all used images appear to be free and are properly tagged.  Good raise  17:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Image review
 * The File: pages File:Peter Jackson01.jpg and File:Andy Serkis 2003.jpg would benefit from using information.
 * File:Peter Jackson01.jpg and File:Andy Serkis 2003.jpg claim to be available under GFDL v1.2. Their named sources ( and ) mention nothing about that however.
 * Added the templates. Should I just remove the GFDL tags? Will that affect the images' licensing? (they're still covered under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license). Thanks,  Ruby   2010/  2013  22:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be one way of "fixing" it.  Good raise  23:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Tweaked the licensing in favor of Creative Commons (and removed GFDL). Thanks,  Ruby  2010/  2013  04:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Revisited.  Good raise  09:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Support NapHit (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.