Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Winter's Bone/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 16:23, 6 June 2011.

List of accolades received by Winter's Bone

 * Nominator(s): Crystal Clear x3 06:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello! I am nominating this list for FL because I believe it meets the criteria. If there are any problems with this list I am more than willing to immediately fix them. Thanks! Crystal Clear x3 06:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Why not, a very good work which deserves a star. Tb hotch * ۩  ۞ 06:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support!! Crystal Clear x3 06:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Support. First, let me declare my interest. I did copyedit the article earlier following a request from Crystal Clear x3. I fixed up some of the sentence structures and removed a redundant description of Rotten Tomatoes. I think the prose is OK now and the links all check out. I can see no issues with the criteria. ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 07:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support! Crystal Clear x3 20:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment – Noticed some misplaced apostrophes in a couple places. There's "appeared in more than two dozen movie reviewer's", where the apostrophe should be at the end, and "included in the Top Ten Best Film's of 2010", which doesn't need one at all.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 02:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have corrected those two sentences. Are there anymore? Thanks Crystal Clear x3 06:20, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I have some basic prose issues.
 * 2010 independent American dramatic production directed by Debra Granik --> Why not just drama film? Dramatic production seems a bit too archaic.
 * done
 * Winter's Bone appeared in more than two dozen movie reviewers --> Substitute the name of the movie here with "The film", since you just mentioned the film's name in the preceding sentence. It looks like repetition.
 * done


 * The film has received various honors in nomination categories ranging from --> The list is mainly about the accolades right? So to make it more straight forward, "The film has received honors in different categories, ranging from..."
 * done


 * Lawrence and Hawkes' acting earned them each a nomination from the 17th Screen Actors Guild Awards. --> Repetition of Lawrence, better would be "Both the principal actors earned a nomination at the 17th Screen Actors Guild Awards..."
 * done


 * It needs a last summarizing sentence indicating how many awards were won frm how many nominations.
 * done

These are all I found from the lead. The references and the table formatting looks splendid, although it would be better if you start archiving the references. Some of them are bound to be dead links soon, especially PDF references. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 11:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input, much appreciated! Crystal Clear x3 22:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Support I am supporting this nomination for promoting it as a FL, but in future I would really like you to archive the links for maintaining its FL status. So many articles deteriorate because of not archiving links. Alas, if only I personally had started it early. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 06:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.