Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Angel Locsin/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 31 July 2022 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Angel Locsin

 * Nominator(s): Pseud 14 (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Having worked and brought Angel Locsin's filmography to FL status, here's another one of her related list article that I am nominating. I've reworked the list by adding a concise and readable introduction/lead, formatted to a singular table, thoroughly searched for RS (publications, newspapers, etc.) that are available online, since sourcing can be a challenge, especially for Filipino subject(s). Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Her own name in the table should sort under L, not A
 * How could I have missed this!! Thanks. Fixed now.


 * "Darna (2005), Majika (2006), and Asian Treasures (2007),[4] the latter of which she was nominated" => "Darna (2005), Majika (2006), and Asian Treasures (2007),[4] for the latter of which she was nominated"
 * Done


 * Presumably the Best Acting Ensemble in a Drama Series award was shared with some other people......?
 * That's correct, I removed mention in the lead, and instead added an explanatory footnote in the awards table that lists co-stars the award is shared.


 * That's all I got - great work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review and kind words, I have addressed the above comments. Let me know if I may have missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Pamzeis
Hopefully not gonna screw this up
 * "her breakthrough role as the" — should it be "roles"?
 * I've reworded this bit, in conjunction with your second point.


 * "for which she received" — for both productions or only one?
 * Yes the recognition was for both film and TV. I've reworded to specify as she receive the award "for her roles"


 * "Further critical success came" — I don't think the list mentions any critical success prior to this, so the "further" kinda comes out of nowhere
 * You're right, fixed.


 * For the result in listicles, is there any result she can get other than "placed"? If not, I would recommend removing this column...
 * No rankings were announced, just a list of awardees/recipients so I've removed.


 * Per MOS:CONFORMTITLE, titles of works in citations should be italicised
 * Done


 * Check for MOS:QWQ issues within refs
 * Done


 * ref 18's title is untranslated
 * Added trans-title and language parameter

Hope this helps :) Pamzeis (talk) 03:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your review. I have addressed above comments. Let me know if I may have missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. Pamzeis (talk) 05:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Aoba47

 * The source and author links for File:Angel Locsin.jpg are not working for me.
 * Unfortunately the original uploader's Picasa account might already be inactive. I could only find an archive link to the album, which I've updated. Hopefully that would suffice, as it seems the images in Commons with better resolutions came from this uploader.
 * Thank you for addressing my comment. The archive link is a perfect solution. Aoba47 (talk) 03:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * A majority of the lead has citations, except for three spots. The end of the lead's first, second, and third paragraphs should have citations.
 * Added the citations for each.

I hope my review is helpful. Once everything has been addressed, I will support this FLC for promotion. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for providing your review, I have addressed the above comments. Pseud 14 (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing everything. I support this FLC for promotion. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my current peer review. Either way, have a great start to your week! Aoba47 (talk) 03:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your support. Sure I’d be happy to have a look at your PR this week. Pseud 14 (talk) 04:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Quick comment – Per MOS:STRUCTURE, the see also section should probably go before the notes. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 00:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note, I have made the change (and will do for the earlier ones where I had done the same). Pseud 14 (talk) 02:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments from TRM
 * There's a spaced hyphen in reference 54, should be en-dash per MOS.
 * Fixed


 * Be consistent with the punctuation in the notes.
 * Added periods for all to be consistent


 * "for which she received a Box Office Entertainment Award for her roles." the table says her "category" was "Princess of Philippine Movies & TV", was this an annual award or something special?
 * It actually is an annual award, there have been years where it was split and different individuals were recognized for TV and Movies. For that year though it was recognition for playing the same roles in both TV and film. The award organization is based on popularity and commercial excellence (box office returns/TV ratings) and only winners are announced. I guess the award name would fall under "category" in lieu of the usual competitive acting award.


 * "for a Star Award for Best Drama Actress" link Star Award in the lead.
 * Linked


 * "fledgling lycanthrope in" any reason we're not using the far more common "werewolf" term here?
 * Switched to "werewolf"


 * "Critical success came..." I'm always wary of using just one source to cite "critical success". Probably needs a few to back this up.
 * Additional sources have been added that provide commentaries/critique of Locsin's performance.

Otherwise this is excellent and practically good to go. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review TRM, I have actioned your comments and provided my responses. Let me know if I might have missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N  02:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.