Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Daddy Yankee/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Daddy Yankee

 * Nominator(s): Brankestein (talk) 01:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the criteria. Brankestein (talk) 01:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note- this nomination was never actually added to WP:FLC until 5/25. -- Pres N  14:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

this FLC has received no comments in nearly two months, would you like to alert possibly some interested people or projects? Or review another list and ask for a quid pro quo review? Or would you like to withdraw the nom? The Rambling Man (talk) 07:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I would like to withdraw the nomination. Brankestein (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I changed my mind. I still want to have this list nominated. Brankestein (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

I can see that a lot of good work has been put into this list, but I have to oppose this as the lead is not structured correctly for this type of list and there is not enough focus on the awards/nominations (which currently only takes up the third paragraph). I would suggest withdrawing this, and rewriting the lead completely. Aoba47 (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments/ Oppose from Aoba47
 * The infobox image is not exactly great. It is not the best quality and the subject's face is covered by a microphone. I would image that this image would be more acceptable as it is a clear image of the artist and it shows him getting an award so it is even more connected with this list.
 * Please remove the reference to the artist's birthday in the first sentence as that is appropriate for the article on the artist, but not for this list.
 * Please rephrase the first sentence to make it match other first sentences of award/nominations FLs. Again, the first list is appropriate for the article on the artist, but not for this list. See List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio and List of awards and nominations received by Lady Gaga. The first sentence should be about the artist's awards and not a general statement about who he is.
 * Remove the statements about his birth and childhood as they are not relevant to this list. Also remove the final sentence of the first paragraph. This should be completely focused on the awards and nominations received by the artist and the sentences mentioned above are not connected to these ideas.
 * Add a link to Gasolina.
 * Add the years in which Gasolina and Barrio Fino were released. Same goes for Barrio Fino En Directo.
 * The spelling of "No. 1" is too informal. Replace it with "number one".
 * The entire second paragraph is focused on the commercial performance of the artist's music and seems more appropriate for the artist's main article and his discography. Remember that the lead should devoted to information on the awards/nominations.
 * The third paragraph is the only part of the lead that directly talks about the awards/nominations, when the list itself is solely about the awards/nominations. The lead needs to be completely rewritten to focus on the content of the list.


 * Thanks a lot for your comments. I will rewrite the lead. Brankestein (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comment. I do not mean to sound too negative with my review as I can tell work has been put into the list, but the lead should be restructured to follow other FLs on similar topics and focus on the actual content of the list (i.e. the awards and nominations). Good luck with it. Aoba47 (talk) 17:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you think about the lead now? I have been doing some changes and I want to know if it is getting better. Brankestein (talk) 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Great work with the revisions. It looks a lot better now. Here are some of my comments below:
 * I would recommend that you look closely at the descriptions for the award sections.
 * I do not believe you need the shortened titles for the awards (i.e. (or ALMA Awards), (or AMAs), etc.)
 * Change the "himself" in the table to "Daddy Yankee".
 * Please add sources to support the descriptions for the awards. See List of awards and nominations received by Lady Gaga for an example of this.

Hope this helps. Aoba47 (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your advices. I changed every "Himself" to "Daddy Yankee", added sources for every award descriptions and removed the shortened titles, but I don't understand what you mean for "look closely at the descriptions for the award sections". Brankestein (talk) 21:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing my comments. I meant that the descriptions for the awards should have sources, but you have added those. I support this. Aoba47 (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry to bother you again, but would you like (if you want) to review the list and determine if it should be promoted to featured list? Brankestein (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I just finished my review with my last comment, and supported this for promotion. Remember that FLCs require multiple users to support the nomination and there needs to a lot of feedback before this is promoted. Aoba47 (talk) 23:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I didn't know that. Brankestein (talk) 23:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. You can read about the process for the FLC at the top of the page. Aoba47 (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.