Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Fiona Apple/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:36, 7 February 2009.

List of awards and nominations received by Fiona Apple
I am nominating this awards list for FL status because I believe it qualifies and I have made several improvements to the list based on suggestions made in the peer review process. -Another Believer (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - I peer reviewed the article and I now find it up to FL standards per WP:WIAFL.-- TRU    CO   22:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Support I participated in the article's peer review, and believe it to be of FL standards. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes http://www.chartstats.com/artistinfo.php?id=9107 a reliable source? Dabomb87 (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I have replaced the ChartStats reference with everyHit.com, the UK Top 40 Hit Database. I hope this helps! -Another Believer (talk) 19:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, Everyhit has not been shown to be reliable either. See this discussion. To determine the reliablity of the site, we need to know what sort of fact checking they do. You can establish this by showing news articles that say the site is reliable/noteworthy/etc. or you can show a page on the site that gives their rules for submissions/etc. or you can show they are backed by a media company/university/institute, or you can show that the website gives its sources and methods, or there are some other ways that would work too. It's their reputation for reliabilty that needs to be demonstrated. Please see Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-26/Dispatches for further detailed information. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it possible I could just site this source? The Guardian is reliable as far as I know, and it indicates at the bottom of the article that "Fast as You Can" reached a chart position of #33. -Another Believer (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Good enough. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done! -Another Believer (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Dead link. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it works. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.