Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Modern Family/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Modern Family

 * Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Modern Family was one of the most acclaimed shows on television during its run (and for good reason, at least in my opinion). It's been a little while since I've worked on an FLC for a TV show awards list, but this one is modeled off those lists, especially the lists for The Office and Friends. This is the longest list I've done, but I'm happy with how it turned out. Quick shoutout to for adding in a few citations along the way. As always, any and all feedback is appreciated. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Support: Excellent work for a FL-esque list. Thank you for my citation work. Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 00:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Dank

 * Support (see below). Usually, I can come up with something; this time I got nothing. Well done. I haven't checked quite as much as usual because I'm a little under the weather, but everything I'm looking at is solid. - Dank (push to talk) 13:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Feeling better, I'll run through my usual process.
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Is it really true that characters (at List of awards and nominations received by Modern Family) should be sorted by their first name? (Since the characters don't have Wikipedia pages of their own, I can't check the DEFAULTSORT magic word. To give a counterexample, Bart Simpson's DEFAULTSORT has him sorted under "S".)
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. I've skimmed the prose; nothing jumps out at me. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the tables.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seems fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. I'd appreciate a review over at List of malvid families, if you have time. - Dank (push to talk) 02:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Regarding sorting, I went with first names since a few characters listed do not have canonical last names. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The only thing that I could find worthy of correction in this list is to italicize all titles of television within reference/article titles including partial titles and abbreviations per MOS:CONFORMTITLE. Otherwise, this list gets a easy support from me.
 * -- Birdienest81 talk  11:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Source review – Reference reliability and formatting both look okay throughout. The link-checker tool had several sites that it listed as causing download errors, but the pages were in working order when I clicked through on them. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  21:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.