Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Muse


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Gimmetrow 22:57, 30 September 2008.

List of awards and nominations received by Muse
"Muse" is treated as plural per British convention. Nominated by User:Andre666 and Gary King ( talk ) 01:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments - sources look okay. Links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - Meets the FL Criteria.-- S R X  13:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Support Great work NapHit (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! The first time I did the alignment it was wonky; it should be good now though. Gary King ( talk ) 20:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Support The Rambling Man (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Sources don't appear to really verify the stuff that it is supposed to be verifying. For example, sources #20 and #21 support Muse winning best live act in 2006, and 2007, but none of the other Q nominations or awards.  naerii  22:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources #18 and #19 only verify the 2008 NME awards and nominations, and none of the other NME stuff. The title for #18 is misleading as it links to the 2008 rewards and Muse didn't win Best British band in 2008. I think this article has issues from when I gutted it of the unreliable musewiki sources that appear to not have been replaced. Source #17 only verifies the 2007 mtvU awards, not the 2005. The same with #16; it only verifies the 2007 MTV Europe awards, and no others. I don't know if this is considered a big deal, but I feel like if we're sourcing the awards at all, it should be done properly. I'm kind of surprised people above are supporting without checking the sources properly ("sources look okay"?); I guess it means that it's an insignificant issue? I would go through the rest but I'm tired right now and I don't know if this is even worth pointing out.  naerii  22:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Naerii, please have another look now :) Gary King ( talk ) 01:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments I know I am co-promoter of this, but I need to point a couple things out which I cannot find.


 * Lack of references
 * "Best British Newcomer" nomination at the 2001 BRITs;
 * "Best British Band" nominations at the 2003 Kerrang!s;
 * "Best Live Act" win at the 2006 Kerrang!s; and
 * "Best Act in the World Today" nomination at the 2008 Qs.

That is all :) Andre666 (talk) 17:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for catching those; I added references for 2001 BRIT Awards and 2003 Kerrang! Awards; the rest already have references. Some of the references cover more than one award (for instance, one says something along the lines of "Muse, who won X award last year"). Gary King ( talk ) 18:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's cool, nice one! You can do one of those resolved comments collapsed tables if you like. Andre666 (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.