Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Peter Dinklage/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Peter Dinklage

 * Nominator(s): AffeL (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it meet the criteria and Peter Dinklage is awesome... AffeL (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Comments from Carbrera
 * Under "Monte-Carlo Television Festival", you mention "Dinklage has been awarded once from one nomination" yet the table claims he was only nominated. I'd change the statement because it may lead the reader into thinking that Dinklage actually won. Other than that, a very a good list indeed. Carbrera (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Thank you. I have now fixed that sentence. - AffeL (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Per the above resolved comments and my suggestion, I will now support this list. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC).

Oppose. Every time I look at this list, I keep finding more and more issues. I just took a look and you didn't request a peer review before nominating this for featured list status. I think you really need to do that and perfect this list before you nominate it a second time. Littlecarmen (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What issues?.. and you don't have to to request a peer review before nomination something. Your "oppose" does not mean anything if you can't come up and present any real issues with this list. I have addressed all your comments btw, but it's clear that you are not willing to discuss for some reason. - AffeL (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

You did address all of the comments I have posted so far but I kept finding more and more and concluded that you needed to work on this list more. It's not mandatory to have your article peer reviewed before nominating it but you do need to make sure it is up to FL standards and I think a peer review is a really good way to do that. Now if peer reviews really are defunct, that's a shame but I don't think the FL nomination process should be used as a substitute. Littlecarmen (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your comment does not hold any value if you can't come up with any issues with this list and a valid reason for the "oppose". You can't just say that their are problems with this list, but I won't tell you what. - AffeL (talk) 08:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's true. Un-actionable comments tend to be ignored by closing delegates. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, your comment on my nomination may be the most childish thing I have seen during my time on Wikipedia. I'm just going to strike my comments here and remove this page from my watchlist. Good luck with your nomination. Littlecarmen (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Peer review is defunct. Please add your comments here.  The Rambling Man (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you mean it's defunct? Littlecarmen (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Barely functioning... The Rambling Man (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.