Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Preity Zinta/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Preity Zinta

 * Nominator(s): Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  21:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Preity Zinta, once a big movie star in India, is no longer active in films, but when she was, her career produced several achievements, including awards and nominations as documented on this page, which I believe meets the criteria for promotion. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  21:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by ChrisTheDude

 * "which, except Filmfare," => "which, in addition to Filmfare,"
 * As the table is sortable, anything that's linked should be linked every time it appears, not just the first
 * With the exception of the 2010 one, the "honours and recognitions" entries are not complete sentences, so should not have full stops
 * That's all I got - nice work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * , thank you for you comments, all of which have been addressed. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  21:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by DaxServer

 * Remove links in TOC box to letters that don't exist (D, E, H, ...) — DaxServer (t · c) 17:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Done, thank you. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  19:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikilink publishers in citations #8 (The Tribune (Chandigarh)), #10, #22, #24, #31, #48 and #50. The citations are stand alone entities and are not consider overlinking MOS:REFLINK
 * Remove Wikilink for published location in cite #34 (viz. Amsterdam), #45
 * Remove Wikilink for published in cite #51 (not the Sify we are looking for), also url is dead
 * Remove url parameter in cite #56's url. If the text adds any value, consider using the quote
 * Normalize (') in cite #31 title "Bollywood’s" -> "Bollywood's"
 * Cite #46: The URL is redirected to Bollywood Hungama and displays different content. Mark as unfit unfit. Change the publisher to "IndiaFM".
 * Cite #47: The URL is redirected to different content. Mark as unfit. Wikilink publisher.
 * Cite #49: URL dead
 * Bibliography (Journeys on Screen: Theory, Ethics, Aesthetics)
 * Wikilink Edinburgh University Press
 * Add Natália Pinazza as editor2
 * "Deepa Mehta, 2008"
 * I'll review others later — DaxServer (t · c) 12:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi there and thank you for your comments. I've applied your comments. Fixed the URLs but didn't understand why you asked me to remove the url from #56 as it's very good (shortened it). Also, 47 works fine for me. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  14:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey Shahid! My opinion on URLs is that canonical URLs are better and URL parameters do not add much value. Altho modern browsers highlight scroll to and highlight the text part we send in the url as  parameter, I am just not convinced it's of much value [in WP citations]. It's not a strong opinion and if you'd contested it, I would've let it go ;) But if you think the text is good, consider adding it as quote in the citation. Upto you.
 * Let's see if we're talking about the same citation #47. There is what I see:
 * If I click on the "original" URL http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2009/02/10/4832/index.html, it's redirecting me to https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/features/nawazuddins-tryst-with-roger-ebert/. Is it different for you? — DaxServer (t · c) 15:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't realise you were referring to the original link. Marked as unfit. :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  19:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I was just looking at the Template:Cite web and it says to use deviated and not unfit when there's a content shift; and unfit is for spammy sources. Could you update #46 and #47 as such? Sorry about the double work :/ — DaxServer (t · c) 13:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  15:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  15:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by FrB.TG
Having worked on her filmography seven years ago, I am happy to see this here. That's it. Nice work. FrB.TG (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * "Her career began with Mani Ratnam's acclaimed drama Dil Se.. (1998), and in that same year she appeared in the box office hit Soldier." This can be simplified to "Her career began in 1998 with Main Ratnam's acclaimed drama Dil Se.. and the box office hit Soldier."
 * "She followed these films with several critically and commercially successful films, such as Mission Kashmir (2000) and Dil Chahta Hai (2001),[5] and her performances in films like Chori Chori Chupke Chupke (2001),[6] Dil Hai Tumhaara (2002)[7] and Armaan (2003)[8] were praised." Repetitive use of "films".
 * "She was named Zee Cine's Queen of Hearts in 2003, and the following year the same group declared her as the female Superstar of the Year." Suggest condensing to something like "Zee Cine named her Queen of Hearts in 2003 and the female Superstar of the Year the following year."
 * "Underworld" in "Mumbai Underworld" should be written in small letters considering it's a common noun. The article Organised crimes in India also does it.
 * Ref. 4 should be marked as "dead" because the link redirects to Bollywoodhungama.com.
 * Thank you very much for your constructive comments, . All comments applied. The third one has been rewritten as follows: "She was named Zee Cine's Queen of Hearts in 2003 and female Superstar of the Year in 2004" because the sentence you suggested ends with "... Year the following year", which has twice year within close proximity. :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  21:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Support - good work. FrB.TG (talk) 22:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments from TRM
That's all I have for a first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Image caption says 2006 but image template on file page says 2008. Plus, source link doesn't work on the file page either.
 * "only Filmfare Award for Best Actress.[9] She" overlinked.
 * "Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television" uses an & instead of "and".
 * "Decade - Female" en-dash needed.
 * These articles normally have a summary of noms/awards in the infobox.
 * WaPo is The WaPo.
 * Avoid SHOUTING in ref titles, e.g. " "25TH ANNIVERSARY GLOBAL AWARDS""


 * Hi,, good seeing you again! All comments addressed (and image page modified) except for one - the summary infobox, which is not mandatory, which I personally highly dislike, and actually not all award FLCs use them. I would thus be happy to keep this page without it. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  14:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Support my primary concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N  16:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.