Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive3


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 09:27, 14 April 2015.

List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra

 * Nominator(s): — Prashant 18:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have previously taken Priyanka Chopra's biography and filmography to FA and FL status respectively. She is one of the most popular and versatile actresses in Hindi cinema. After the premature nominations, I worked hard on it and I feel that it now meets the FL-criteria.— Prashant 18:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by Cowlibob
I'm feeling better so let's start anew.
 * need ref for "twelve distinct roles", "serial killer", "autistic woman"
 * I would remove the Surfer's Choice awards, I know they are sourced but is winning an internet poll really an award?
 * Removed.— Prashant 17:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Each award ceremony needs to have a reference proving who it is given by and for what. The most recent one of this type of list had that List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan.
 * Suggestion for more recent picture of her at an awards ceremony, [], [], []. I'll leave it up to you to select. Cowlibob (talk) 16:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Cited sources for her roles and changed her picture to a more recent one.— Prashant 21:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Ssven2

 * "In 2000, she participated in the Femina Miss India contest, where she finished second, winning the Femina Miss India World title." — How can she come second and win the title. Shouldn't the title go to the first place?
 * Added a note.— Prashant 06:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The sentences on 7 Khoon Maaf and Barfi! tend to get a bit repititive. Can you tweak one of them a bit?
 * "Chopra has received several honours from film and fashion organisations." — Bro, I think you can tweak this a bit like "Chopra has been honoured by various organisations such as ..." (the dots signify some of the organisations' names.)
 * Tweaked all of them.— Prashant 06:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Support — Thanks, Prashant!. That's all from me. Good luck! — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 06:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Kailash29792

 * Maintain consistency between "That same year" and "The same year".
 * The same for "Bollywood", "Hindi cinema" and "Hindi film industry".
 * "four each from Filmfare and IIFA Awards" - write "four Filmfare and IIFA awards each".
 * Replace "essay" with something more standard like "portray" or "play".
 * "received a second nomination for Best Supporting Actress" - received her second nomination.
 * "winning the second consecutive Star Guild Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role" winning her second consecutive award.
 * "for her twelve roles in the 2009 social comedy film What's Your Raashee?" - for playing twelve distinct roles.
 * Fix the link to Barfi.
 * "Chopra won a second Screen and a third Star Guild Awards for Best Actress for portraying Mary Kom in the eponymous biographical sports drama." - I don't know how, but this can be written better.
 * Do we usually refer to a site with the ".com" extension? I think it is good to simply call it "Rediff".
 * Please fix the column alignment in "Sabsey Favourite Kaun Awards".
 * Wikilink Gaana.com.


 * That's it for now. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Tweaked and corrected all of them.— Prashant 17:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Still some don't seem corrected; is the "year" column in Sabsey... deliberately aligned like that?
 * What is the exact problem with alignment?— Prashant 16:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't explain. Ask Ssven or Krimuk, they may know how to say. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed.— Prashant 12:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * "Chopra has won one award." - a single award.
 * Should I name the award in the case of one award win?— Prashant 16:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I did it and saw the preview. It looked repetitive. I think it's fine to say "She has won one award". What do you think?— Prashant 04:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Because "won" and "one" sound alike, I suggested rewording. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Re-worded.— Prashant 12:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * "They are presented by Filmfare magazine" - presented by the magazine Filmfare.
 * "Chopra has won two awards from two nominations." - you mean she won both nominations? Write that way.
 * Under "Global Indian Film and TV Honours", there is some mess. Correct that.
 * "in the Hindi language]] cinema" - pathetic. Write "Hindi cinema", "the Hindi film industry" or simply Bollywood.
 * "Chopra has won five awards from five nominations." - you mean she won all five nominations? Write that way.
 * "cinematic achievements in the Hindi cinema." - Huh?
 * "Chopra has received honours outside of her acting." - pathetic. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I have corrected all the above problems. Thanks! — Prashant 16:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Support: Good work Prashant! Kailash29792 (talk) 05:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments from SNUGGUMS
The lead looks good, particularly after above input. Here's my list of things to address:


 * Tables
 * Since Hello! is a dubious source, remove the awards from them; not notable
 * Is "Stardust" a reliable source? If not, remove the awards from them
 * Both Stardust and Hello are reliable sources. The awards are notable as well.— Prashant 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Unreliable source = Non-notable award. Hello! is too gossipy to be considered reliable. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello! is a part of The Times Group division, the organisers of Filmfare Awards. They are very much notable. I have cited a source from "Business of Cinema", which is enough to prove its notability.— Prashant 20:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't be fooled; parent company isn't an automatic indicator of reliability. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Your problem was with the unreliable source and not the award it organise. Right? I think I should move that to other awards section. What's say?— Prashant 09:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * My problem is with unreliable source used AND award itself; there is previous consensus not to include awards from organizations that are unreliable Snuggums (talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 14:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Removed.— Prashant 20:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * References
 * The Times of India should only be linked in FN1
 * Bollywood Hungama should only be linked in FN7
 * I'm not sure "Big Star Entertainment Awards" should be italicized in FN's 18–20
 * An episode citation have that kind of format. That's why the name is italicized.— Prashant 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * "Indiantelevision.com" should read "Indian Television" in FN5
 * Corrected.— Prashant 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * External links
 * Is the IMDb link really needed?
 * I don't know if it's neccessary. But, all the featured articles/lists contains that link in the external link section.— Prashant 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Decent list overall. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 16:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Support now this meets FL standards <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 21:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Daan0001
Support: Nicely written list. Much improved. My full support. Daan0001 (talk) 14:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * – SchroCat (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.