Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Psych/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 18:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Psych

 * Nominator(s): Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 23:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Here we go again. I present to you: the awards and nominations for Psych, the poster child for a truly under-appreciated show. I really wish this list could be longer, but here it is. All 31 awards and nominations. Psych officially ends tomorrow (I suggest that everyone watch the finale), and I have been working hard to get this list improved before the end. I have sourced everything, and have information about each award, as it appears is standard among other featured lists of this type. I appreciate any comments you give. Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 23:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Support (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). Quite high level quality improvement effort by . Most interesting that both List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit! and List of awards and nominations received by Psych include IIG Awards. Seems like both shows have helped educate viewers about science. :) Great job overall, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * In the infobox "Awards & Nominations", no need for capital N.
 * Changed.


 * If the "NAMIC Vision Awards" aren't notable enough for a Wikipedia article, why are they notable enough to be included in this list?
 * Actually, I think that both the NAMIC awards and the organization itself are both notable enough for their own articles. Both have received more than decent media and literary coverage (example: This Business of Broadcasting).


 * Don't think you need wikilinks in table captions.
 * Removed links.


 * "for favorite TV actor in a leading role" doesn't appear to have been, all four awards appear to be slightly different from one another.
 * Reworded.


 * "American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers" no comma after Authors.
 * Removed comma.


 * In image captions, I tend to see (pictured) as (pictured).
 * Italicized.


 * Imagen Awards and Imagen Foundation link to the same article, little point in linking them both in the same sentence.
 * Unlinked Imagen Foundation.


 * No real need for the Awkward screen grab. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Removed image.

I believe that I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks for the review. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 02:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - can't see any issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Support Good list that should satisfy FLC after you've made Crisco's amendments. Cowlibob (talk) 12:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comments from Crisco 1492
 * The show has been most recognized in terms of awards for its first episode, "Pilot"; its musical team; the series itself; and actor James Roday. - Well, if it's only received five awards, and you're naming four categories, that kind of makes "most recognized" pretty much useless, right?
 * Removed "most".


 * Try to curb the number of sentences starting with "the awards"
 * It's down to at most one occurrence per section. Is this good enough?


 * Double check to be sure that the series' title is in italics throughout the article
 * I believe I have finished this.


 * Double check to be sure that episode titles are in quotes throughout the article
 * Same with above.


 * Avoid using the present perfect if the show is not likely to get anymore awards ("has never...")
 * I believe I have removed all instances of this.


 * You don't really need "list of" in the table headers; it adds nothing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I have begun the fixes. I'll try to get the rest done in a day or so. Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 06:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe I have addressed all of your remaining concerns, Crisco 1492. Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 17:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, that looks to be it. Support. Good work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

– SchroCat (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.