Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Scissor Sisters/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by 17:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Scissor Sisters

 * Nominator(s): Another Believer  ( Talk ) 18:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

I am thrilled to be back at FLC! I have decided to nominate this awards list, which was formerly promoted to FL status only to be downgraded a few months later. Since then, Scissor Sisters has received additional awards and nominations and I do not believe the same arguments for demotion apply. Happy to address concerns as they arise. Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Comment/Question: There are currently two dead links. Unfortunately, I am unable to find working links to verify these claims, which is unfortunate since I believe the claims are true and were verified during the previous FLC process. Should this information be removed until a working link can be found? -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you tried retrieving the links through the Internet archive? NapHit (talk) 00:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No, and I am not familiar with the archive. Perhaps if I do some investigating it will be self-explanatory. Thanks. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oops, forgot about the second link. Doing... -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The archive will not work for the Blender link and I am unable to find the "500 Greatest Songs Since You Were Born" list elsewhere. Should I remove this recognition from the article? -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think so. Unless we can verify it another way, it's not really suitable for inclusion.... The Rambling Man (talk) 18:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Removed claim and added a note on the article talk page explaining reason for content removal. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support, clear and simple formatting, duly cited throughout with appropriate notation and citations. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support, well cited and organized. Great work with the list! &mdash; Underneath-it-All (talk) 02:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Support - After checking over everything, I can't really see any issues.  Toa   Nidhiki05  20:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments –
 * Support – Meets the standards. Zia Khan 08:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * "The group gained prominence after signing with the independent record label A Touch of Class, during which...". There's no time period here that "during which" would be related to. This part needs a rewrite.
 * Better? Now reads: "The group gained prominence after signing with the independent record label A Touch of Class and their songs..." -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Are page numbers possible for refs 15 and 33? Giants2008  ( Talk ) 00:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I do not own either book. I cannot find the Grammy book at my library, so I have replaced the reference with an online source verifying the same information. I have added the "1001 Albums" book to my library hold list and will update the page number ASAP. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Update: Well, it turns out I cannot find the album listed in the book I picked up from the library. However, the library only has the "revised and updated" version. Accordingly, I have removed the book as a reference and included the Los Angeles Times link instead. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by Sufur222 Apart from that, the list looks fine to me. I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  13:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Ref 33 is dead, and thus needs replacing. Also, in the same reference, Billboard should probably be linked, and it is currently published by Prometheus Global Media (which should also be linked), taking over from Nielsen Business Media in 2009.
 * Replaced dead link. Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.