Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone

 * Nominator(s): Aoba47 (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, the following is a list of honors and "dishonors" received by American actress Sharon Stone. It also includes information on her non-performance honors. I look forward to receiving everyone's feedback. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments from Paparazzzi
 * The archived reference about the Emmy Awards does not support what is explained on the list; however, the original supports only what is on bold: "...recognizes excellence in the television industry, and corresponds to the Academy Award (for film), the Tony Award (for theatre), and the Grammy Award (for music)"
 * Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * "The nominees are decided by MTV producers and executives; winners are decided online by the general public". Just a question, has always been that way?
 * I would assume that it was not done this way through the internet (as the award show was started in 1992). Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Change the present tense in the The Stinkers Bad Movie Awards section, because the award is not given anymore
 * Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * These are my comments. When you addressed them, I will support. Paparazzzi (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review! I have addressed your comments. Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I support this nomination. Congrats, ! Paparazzzi (talk) 00:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: all of my comments have been taken care of. I am still unsure about those 10 references (nr# 28, 29, 33-35, 37, 43-46) that have no links and I also understand that there is nothing we can do about it (I have been through this myself multiple times). I shall leave it on the source reviewer. Other than that issue, it is a fine piece of work. – FrB.TG (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Aoba47 (talk) 19:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Support I don't notice anything major. Very nice work. MCMLXXXIX 20:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Support this list, just one thing to say. Add one or two external links. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support, but "awards and nominations" lists do not typically use external links. Aoba47 (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Support – I made one change for consistency. Great work. Carbrera (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 01:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Source Review:

Nothing too objectionable, though a couple of points regarding formatting:
 * While Naming conventions (companies) is a little vague, typically you do not include incorporation marks (LLC, Inc, Co., etc.) in the names of companies in text or references like you're doing for some of the publishers- so ref. 2 would be "Tronc", not "Tronc, Inc."
 * Removed Inc. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Also, typically you don't include the publisher in a reference if it's just the same as the work, or very similar- so "New York. New York Media." would just be "New York" in ref. 5. You're actually inconsistent with this- ref 16 is missing a publisher (Guardian Media Group), but you have it for other newspapers that publish themselves.
 * Removed "New York Media" and added Guardian Media Group with a link. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Either link the first instance of a work/publisher or all of them- you link Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in refs 6 and 7, and Hastings Bad Cinema Society in refs 34-36, but then only link Hollywood Foreign Press Association in ref 10 and not the next 4 refs.
 * Linked all of the references to Hollywood Foreign Press Association. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for archiving your online sources. I agree that you don't need access dates if you do that.
 * Thank you! I tried my best with this for all of my articles/lists. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Man, citing the award ceremony is definitely sketchy. I know the precedent has been set before, but I'm still not 100% about it. Wish the minor award groups would just put up a website with some ugly lists with the information and call it a day.
 * I completely agree and I do admit that it is very sketchy indeed. If this prevents the list from passing as a FLC, then I completely understand and can try to dig even deeper to find resources that cover the information. I just have not had any luck with my previous searches. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * "Movies for Grownups® Gala" - remove the trade mark in ref 53
 * Oops, that is embarrassing. Removed the trade mark. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

That's all, spotchecks showed no problems. -- Pres N  21:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review! I greatly appreciate it. I have addressed all of your comments. Let me know if there is anything else that I can do to improve the list. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * A couple more:
 * Ref 2 was an example, you also have them in ref 18 and 23
 * Completed. Aoba47 (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The works in 41-44 should probably link to Chicago Film Critics Association- or better yet, have that as the publisher like you do for the Stinker awards in 34-36
 * Completed. Aoba47 (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Missed this the first time- in ref 4, you have the website non-italicized and with a capital first letter, but the opposite in ref 58. -- Pres N  21:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the further comments. I have addressed your above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Alright, passing. -- Pres N  02:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.