Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 07:12, 11 April 2009.

List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow

 * Nominator(s): Another Believer  ( Talk )

I am nominating this awards list for FL status because I believe it qualifies. I have created several similar awards lists that have reached FL status, so I am aware of the expectations and I hope this one can join the others. Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment The list is generally from the overall look FL quality but: Rock on the Net is not considered a reliable source Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_25. This a lot of work I think to find the right sources for something like that.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? That's a shame. I have seen Rock on the Net used on many of the featured awards lists, and I did not have trouble using the site for the other awards lists I created. However, I appreciate the feedback, and I will start looking for alternative references . Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Rock on the Net is no longer used as a reference. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The References shouldn't have their own column but be at the end of the intro paragraph of each section or in any of the already available columns. Examples: List of awards and nominations received by Akon (references at the sentence before the table), List of awards and nominations received by Judy Garland (references in the year column). --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your feedback. Actually, I would like to get some additional feedback on this issue. I am aware of what method other articles use, but I wanted to see if this template would be accepted. For a chart with 32 nominations, I think the Ref. column allows the reader to be directed to a specific entry's source, as opposed to simply having to guess which reference at the end of the paragraph pertains to a particular entry. If other reviewers wish to see the Refs at the end of the paragraph, I can certainly fix that ASAP. I just thought it made the article look more organized, and it was easier for the reader.-- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Before I review, I would like to say that I agree with this new format because having like 32 refs at the end of a paragraph is just overkill.-- ₮ RU  C Ө   02:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support -- Unbelievable but I found no problems that prevents it from meeting WP:WIAFL.-- ₮ RU  C Ө   02:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment Is/Are there any WikiProject(s) that this list could go under? Dabomb87 (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. WikiProject Country Music seems to fit best. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I think this list is more justified than most of the current awards list FLs, but I think it might not hurt to hold off on promoting this one until after the current criteria dispute is resolved. -- Scorpion 0422  15:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Despite the changes to the FL criteria, I still believe this article warrants being a stand-alone list. Therefore, my support stands. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Despite the new FL criteria, this list is still up to those standards. Still support-- T ru  c o   14:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Despite the new FL criteria, this list is up to those standards. I support.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.