Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Bill/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:04, 8 November 2010.

List of awards and nominations received by The Bill

 * Nominator(s): 5 albert square (talk), HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?,  JuneGloom07    Talk? , and Courcelles 00:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because this was archived last month with no outstanding comments, and a single support. It just, well, stagnated. So I'm bringing it back in hopes of more commentary this time. Courcelles 00:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 00:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - looking at the list alone, it is very well referenced. No problems with references that I can see. --5 albert square (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll take a second look later, ping me if I forget.  Jujutacular  talk 04:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: why you added a total awards in the infobox, but didn't mention all awards which the page including?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 11:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I don't understand you. The infobox does contain all awards, the details of which are the body of the list.  If you are discussing the lede, it is never possible for a lede to cover every item on a list, otherwise there would be no purpose in having the actual list.  The lede is a summary, not a repetition, of the content of the list. Courcelles 11:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * sorry i didn't saw that it was collapsed-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 11:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support everything looks very good! My support is easily won :)--AlastorMoody (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support: i support too-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 12:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment How sure are we that File:Thebillnewsequence3-1.jpg is too simple for copyright eligibility? The text itself seems plain enough, but the background is perhaps skirting on that border.  Jujutacular  talk 16:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe you're seeing something I'm not. All I see is "BILL" with a blue background that fades to black around the edge.  There's nothing really approaching the threshold of originality here as I understand the rules.  Is there something in this image I'm just not seeing? Courcelles 16:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea, that's all I'm seeing, but the standard is pretty low. Examples: File:Lost title card.jpg, File:Grey's Anatomy Logo.svg, File:Body-of-proof.jpg.  Jujutacular  talk 17:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The LOST one, at least needs to be re-licensed, (all of them really do), see Featured article review/Lost (TV series)/archive1 and Elcobbola's quoting of the law, ""names, titles, short phrases, slogans, familiar symbols, mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, coloring, and listings of contents or ingredients are not subject to copyright"" Courcelles 08:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll concede on the Lost and Body of Proof images. At any rate, if no one else seems to think this borders on minimum originality, I'll shut up ;)  Jujutacular  talk 19:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Great work: organized, well written, well sourced.  Jujutacular  talk 19:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support a good list. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - everything looks fine. Afro  ( Talk ) 10:59, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.