Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Office (American TV series)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by The Office (American TV series)

 * Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

I've gotten pretty comfortable writing TV awards lists, and The Office is a popular show, so I figured it's time to bring this up to FL standard. To be honest, I was somewhat surprised this wasn't already covered by The Office task force at WP:TV, and working on this nomination is my way of contributing to their work. Also, interesting side note: this list would join the corresponding awards FLs for Community, Parks and Recreation, and 30 Rock, completing the set for what I would argue was the best night for sitcoms in recent history. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support - I've got nothing. You certainly have made these into a fine art -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Popsugar has not been reviewed kindly at RSN   -- In actu (Guerillero)  Parlez Moi 18:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to know – I've replaced it with a USA Today source. RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support passes my source review -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 18:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked sorting on all columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article seems well-sourced to reliable sources (at least, as compared to other accolade lists ... I have no idea what's going on at, for instance, The Oklahoman). UPSD is flagging Huffpost, but it's not a problem. The tool isn't indicating any other problems (but this isn't a source review).
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. The one image doesn't meet the "originality" requirement to require a copyright check.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. (I hope you'll drop by my plant list nominations every now and then, but they tend to be long, so don't sweat it.) - Dank (push to talk) 23:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Support a very good piece of work. I would like consistency with "access-dates" for all online references rather than just some, but that's not a show-stopper. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 13:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Understandable – I included access dates on the sources I had to find, but many of the existing sources didn't use them. If you'd like, I can try to find relevant dates, or I can just leave it as is. RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Access-dates are just the dates that you last went to the online reference. You don't need to search for them, just check each reference is live and add an access-date for each one you check of the day you check it. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 11:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  02:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.