Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Vampire Diaries/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by NapHit 02:06, 8 January 2013.

List of awards and nominations received by The Vampire Diaries

 * Nominator(s):  undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   21:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe this article meets all the criteria. I've worked extensively on this. I will endeavour to answer any queries, concerns and comments. Thank you for your attention to this nomination. undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   21:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Support on all criteria. TBrandley (what's up) 18:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, good referencing, just a caveat that hopefully the nominator and/or other interested users will update the "pending" entries over time. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Support on prose and images. Solid list. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose? to be honest, it is not very clear to me that this list deserves to be a stand-alone one. Essentially asides from PCA, TCA and Saturn, all the other awards are minor at best. And of these 3 only the Saturn one is actually prestigious. Even then, if only the 3 are kept, this list can easily be incorporated into the main series article, at least for the time being. Nergaal (talk) 09:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't know there was any criterion for "prestigiousness". This is very subjective. I consider every notable (large media coverage and being covered by multiple reliable primary and secondary sources) award prestigious, for you only Saturn Award crosses this threshold and perhaps for someone only EGOT are prestigious. List (including accompanying prose) is big enough to be accommodated in the main article. undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   14:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * There isn't a criterion for prestigiousness. It's simply Nergaal's opinion that some awards are more important than others unless referenced. I see no issue with this, all lists of this type include nominations from every award the film/tv show was nominated for. We don't exclude based on some sense of one being more important than the other. Therefore, as I am concerned, the list should not be merged into the parent article as Nergaal states. NapHit (talk) 11:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed, Nergaal's"personal preference" is really not of any note with regard to the notability of awards. Why on earth he would suggest deleting a massive number of awards and then merging back into the main article is entirely beyond me.  This will be a call for Giants2008 unless the nomination drags on a bit, but I will disregard the above "personal" oppose.  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.