Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Voice (U.S. TV series)/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by The Voice (U.S. TV series)

 * Nominator(s): Mymis (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

I am nominating it for featured list because I do believe that it passes the FL criteria. The article includes a list of various awards and nominations received by popular American singing competition series The Voice aired on NBC. The list was nominated before but failed to attract enough reviewers. Mymis (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments from Aoba47
 * There is an unnecessary repetition of the word “singing” in the third sentence of the first paragraph, and I would change “singing competition” since it was previously used in the first sentence.
 * Something about the phrasing of the second sentence seems strange to me. The show itself isn’t really looking for new talent, as the judges and producers are really doing this. You could be right with this, but I just wanted to raise this point to you.
 * Not sure about the wording with a “panel of four coaches”. Yes, there are four coaches, but that wording and the phrasing “a panel of four coaches who choose…” makes it sound like the judges work together as a single unit to choose and help contestants when they act individually with their individual teams of contestants. I would just say something like “the series features four coaches who choose their favorite…” and in that case, change “guides” to “guide”.


 * Great work with this article. All of my comments are more nitpick-oriented. Let me know if you have any questions about my review. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this once my review is addressed. Aoba47 (talk) 04:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, I believe I fixed them. Could you take a look again? Thanks! Mymis (talk) 19:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Awesome job with this article, and thank you for your prompt response. I can definitely support this. If possible, could you review my FLC? Aoba47 (talk) 17:11, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * "and guides their selected teams through" - I think it should be guide without the conjugation since we are talking about the four coaches.
 * Fixed it.


 * Since The Voice is an American show, the winning prize is likely to be in US dollars so I don't think you need to wiki-link $.
 * Unlinked.


 * "The Voice has additionally been nominated for six Critics' Choice Television Awards (three wins), six People's Choice Awards (three wins), four Television Critics Association Awards, six Teen Choice Awards (three wins for the series) ..." - could we at least name some of the awards? What is the difference between this and infobox then? The awards from Critics' Choice the show has received are very notable categories.
 * All the awards listed in the sentence are for the show itself as outstanding/best reality series, nothing so much to break it down. I could shorten the sentence: "The Voice has additionally been nominated for six Critics' Choice Television Awards (three wins), six People's Choice Awards (three wins), four Television Critics Association Awards, among other awards", if the paragraph seems to be too detailed.
 * Yeah, that would be good - you don't need to count every award it has won. Some of them can perhaps be removed without any harm e.g. Teen Choice or Billboard Mid-Year. But still I would like to see at least the awards from Critics' choice to be mentioned. Perhaps instead of saying that the show has won three Critics' Choice Awards, you could say that the show has won three Critics' Choice Television Awards for Best Reality Series – Competition or three Critics' Choice Television Awards in the Best Reality Series – Competition category? FrB.TG (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * "The coaches of the show have also been acknowledged with nine nominations and three wins" - way too wordy. Perhaps better as "... show have also won three awards from nine nominations".
 * Paraphrased.


 * Those texts above the tables are quite unnecessary e.g. "List of ADG Excellence in Production Design Awards and nominations received by The Voice", "List of ASCAP Film and Television Music Awards and nominations received by The Voice". It is quite obvious that these are accolades received by The Voice and not Breaking Bad.
 * Well, they emphasize what a certain table covers. I've seen it in many other articles, do you think it's way too redundant?
 * All the tables have their sections. I don't think it could any clearer and yes it is redundant. FrB.TG (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * "recognise" is British. It should be recognize.
 * Fixed it.


 * I think you might need Levine's full name in the image caption.
 * Added it.


 * WP:ALT text needed for the images.
 * Added it.

I will probably check references later. – FrB.TG (talk) 08:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking a look at my article. I tried to address all the issues. Do you have any more comments? Mymis (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * comments await you! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The total count can perhaps be shifted to the very beginning as it reads more relevant. It can begin with something like, "As of 2016, American reality television singing competition The Voice has won 32 awards from a total of 95 nominations. The show premiered on NBC..."
 * Well, I don't know, the opening paragraph covers the show itself, with subsequent ones dealing with the awards, it's more organized to mention the sentence in the end.


 * Take a look at the first word of each sentences in the opening paragraph: all beginning with the definite article (or the show's title). Quite repetitive. I would rephrase.
 * Changed it.


 * I have no issues with sources i.e. formatting and reliability - no spotcheck. That is quite impressive! – FrB.TG (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, do you have any more comments? Mymis (talk) 01:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'd replied to your responses which are yet to be addressed. – FrB.TG (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, they were. Is there an issue you mentioned that I missed? Mymis (talk) 14:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I had some concerns in my initial review. You disagreed with some which I've replied to - see the first few comments. – FrB.TG (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think you're following me here: look at my reply to your reply on the third and fifth comments. – FrB.TG (talk) 15:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw your replies, and I agree with them, and applied them to the article. Sorry I didn't reply directly underneath your replies. Mymis (talk) 17:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Whoopsy daisy! Thanks for addressing them. I believe I can support the list's promotion now. Also, I am pinging the reviewer of the previous nom . – FrB.TG (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Source review – While I'm here, I'll save you some time and take a look at the sourcing. All of the references appear reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker reveals no problems. That aspect of the article is a pass as far as I'm concerned. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments! I did make all the changes. I didn't include all the awards in the lead because it'd make it overdetailed, as pointed by one of the reviewers. Mymis (talk) 11:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Support – All of my concerns have been resolved. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  12:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.