Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Wire/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC).

List of awards and nominations received by The Wire

 * Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Here's an awards list about a show that is perhaps more notable for the awards it didn't receive. This is modeled after my previous FLCs for various awards lists. As always, any feedback is welcome. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * "the large number of Black actors" - don't think black needs a capital
 * "It also was nominated" => "It was also nominated"
 * That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments from HAL

 * Maybe change Baltimore, Maryland to Baltimore, Maryland
 * Done. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Solid work. I'll go ahead and support. ~ HAL  333  19:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Other comments
Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. I checked sorting on all columns and sampled the links in the table. Some will say that "Television Programs of the Year" should sort after "Television: Dramatic Series", but there's no consistency on this on Wikipedia and I think it's fine as is. There are a lot of media lists that I don't feel comfortable doing prose reviews for, and this is one of them, but I don't think that matters for purposes of this review; you know what you're doing, and you've got a couple of supports that include prose already. The coding at the top of the table seems fine.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. There are no images below the lead.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support, well done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Support from Aoba47
Wonderful work with the list and it is nice to see this show being featured in more and more featured content on Wikipedia. I support this FLC for promotion based on the prose. I have read through the lead a few times and I honestly could not find anything that need further adjustment. Aoba47 (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Some Dude

 * Notes #3 and #5 are the same. Can they be merged?
 * Wikilink Dave McNary, Alessandra Stanley, and Emma Jones (journalist).
 * Not sure the Emma Jones article refers to the same person this article cites... RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Mark sources from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
 * Mark sources from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
 * Only certain parts of Rolling Stone seem to be paywalled, and this isn't one of them. RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Mark sources from The Atlantic with "|url-access=limited".
 * Mark sources from The Baltimore Sun with "|url-access=limited".
 * Mark sources from The Wall Street Journal with "|url-access=subscription".
 * Sources from BBC.com should link to that (or just BBC Online).
 * Be consistent with either San Francisco Chronicle (#7) or SFGate (#44).
 * These are actually two different websites at two different domain names. RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You can use for the external link.
 * That's it from me. Ping me when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments above – everything I didn't respond to should be fixed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding. Happy to support. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Source review – I spotted no further formatting issues on top of those already raised above, reliability looks all right throughout, and the links are all in working order. The source review has been passed. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Promoting. -- Pres N  22:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.