Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of career achievements by Cristiano Ronaldo/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC).

List of career achievements by Cristiano Ronaldo

 * Nominator(s): Hurrygane (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list. Hurrygane (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

First off, your description for nominating is probably the best one I've seen since being an FLC contributor. Anyways on to comments: That's it for now. Nice work! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comments from BeatlesLedTV
 * Featured lists don't begin with "the list of..."
 * I think for this list to be featured it shouldn't be a dynamic list – it should be complete
 * All images need alt text (use this)
 * All tables need scope cols & rows per MOS:ACCESS
 * In the "FIFA Club World Cup Golden Ball" table, people should be sorted by last name per WP:Sorting, ref cols should be unsortable, as well as in general sort by ascending year
 * Honestly feel like many of these tables don't need to be sortable
 * Countries should be listed next to their respective flags. Most people probably can't tell countries by their flag
 * Done (excluding one matter; I thought tables were already sorted by ascending year?) ✔ Hurrygane (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Comment - not sure why there is a list dedicated to his career achievements, or Lionel Messi for that matter, doesn't that set a precedent? All their football honours and achievements could be summarised in their respective pages, something like this borders on WP:LISTCRUFT. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose if we are embarking on a path of creating a template for the career achievements of footballers (isn't almost all of this covered in Ronaldo's article?), it needs to be spot on. This, in my opinion, is not.  Far, far, far too much of it is unreferenced, and that's a speedy fail.  It's not particularly engaging to "read", it's list after table after list after table.  I'm sure it's taken a lot of hard work to get it here, but in my opinion, it's not really a piece of featured work.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose agree with TRM; somehow, even with 200+ references, there are still a ton of things left unreferenced, and the layout is just... exhausting. The first of those is at least straightforward enought to deal with, but there's no response to TRM's comment in the last 10 days, and the nominator has been sporadically active in that time. I'm going to close this fairly soon if there's no movement. -- Pres N  20:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Closing. -- Pres N  04:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.