Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC).

List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket

 * Nominator(s): – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Second time of asking for this list. It has improved significantly since it was previous nominated back in December 2014. The list has also doubled to 26 centuries in that time. As always, I am happy to address any and all points raised. Thanks in advance to all reviewers. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Otherwise, this looks a pretty solid piece of work, well done. Harrias talk 09:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks very much for the prompt review. I have addressed and actioned your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support – if you get a chance, could you take a look at Featured list candidates/1924 Winter Olympics medal table/archive1 for me? Harrias  talk 20:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have just reviewed the list. Thanks again for your comments and support. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support my concerns addressed, good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support - Nice work &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Center the ref column other than that support. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have centred the ref column. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Source review – All of the sources appear to be reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker reveals no problems (not counting the fact that the tool apparently has trouble with ICC links). Spot-checks of refs 32 and 40 also turned up no concerns. I'd say this is a pass. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your review and comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.